Research note: Continuity or change: Intergenerational patrilocal residence patterns among Indians in India and abroad (USA, UK, and Canada)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20377/jfr-1036Keywords:
Cross-National Analysis, Post-Marital Co-Residence, gender dynamicsAbstract
Objective: This paper examines patrilocality among Indian women in India, first-generation Indian immigrant women, and second-generation Indian women in Canada, the US, and the UK, analyzing the impact of age, education, and employment on post-marital co-residence patterns.
Background: Patrilocality is associated with women's dependence and subordination in societies where it is prevalent. This paper investigates the incidence of patrilocality in the parent population and in three major destination countries for Indian immigrants (where it is uncommon), exploring the implications for gender dynamics.
Method: The study presents a comparative descriptive analysis and examines the relationship between post-marital co-residence patterns and demographic variables of age, educational attainment, and employment status, using binary logistic regression. The sample includes Indian women in India (IPUMS, 2009), first-generation Indian immigrant women and second-generation Indian women in Canada (IPUMS, 2011) and US (IPUMS, 2015), and UK (UKLFS, 2008 to 2012).
Results: Across all groups, women are more likely to live with their husbands’ parents rather than their own (patrilocality). Patrilocality decreases with age, varies with education across countries and generations, and is consistently lower among employed women.
Conclusion: The findings highlight the persistence of patrilocal traditions in both India and the Indian diaspora, emphasizing the need to understand cultural norms, socioeconomic factors, and policy implications to advance gender equity.
References
Bentley, A. (2018). The role of in-laws as perpetrators of violence against women in Mumbai. International Journal of Social Sciences and Interdisciplinary Studies, 3(1): 4-20. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ijssis/issue/55412/759781 [retrieved August 16, 2024]
Biswas, C. S., & Mukhopadhyay, I. (2018). Marital status and women empowerment in India. Sociology International Journal, 2(1): 29-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15406/sij.2018.02.00030
Blaauboer, M., Mulder, C. H., & Zorlu, A. (2011). Distances between couples and the man’s andwoman’s parents. Population, Space and Place, 17(5): 597–610. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.648
Chan, T. W., & Ermisch, J. (2015a). Proximity of couples to parents: impacts of gender, labor market, and family. Demography, 52(2): 379–399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-015-0379-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-015-0379-0
Delhi High Court (2023). The Times of India. Woman's insistence on living separately from in-laws amounts to cruelty. Retrieved from https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/delhi/hc-womans-insistence-on-living-separately-from-in-laws-amounts-to-cruelty/articleshow/103039230.cms [retrieved January 5, 2024]
Ebenstein, A. (2014). Patrilocality and Missing Women. The American Economic Review, 104(5): 61-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2422090
Ghodsee, K. R. (2023). To Smash the Patriarchy, We Need to Get Specific About What It Means. Jacobin Magazine. https://jacobin.com/2023/06/patriarchy-traditional-multigenerational-wealth-privilege-feminism [retrieved December 18, 2023]
Glick, J. E., Bean, F. D., & Van Hook, J. V. W. (1997). Immigration and Changing Patterns of Extended Family Household Structure in the United States: 1970-1990. Journal of Marriage and Family, 59(1): 177-191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/353671
Goli, S., Arora, S. & Jain, N. (2022). Patrilocality and Child Sex Ratios in India. SSRN Electronic Journal, 1-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4031227
Grogan, L. (2013). Household formation rules, fertility and female labour supply: Evidence from post-communist countries. Journal of Comparative Economics, 41(4): 1167-1183. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2012.11.001
Gruijters, R. J., & Ermisch, J. (2018). Patrilocal, Matrilocal, or Neolocal? Intergenerational Proximity of Married Couples in China. Journal of Marriage and Family, 80(5): 1253-1269. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/xzqbe
Huinink, J., Brüderl, J., Nauck, B., Walper, S., Castiglioni, L., & Feldhaus, M. (2011). Panel analysis of intimate relationships and family dynamics (pairfam): Conceptual framework and design. Journal of Family Research, 23(1): 77–101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20377/jfr-235
Hunnicut, G. (2009). Varieties of Patriarchy and Violence Against Women: Resurrecting “Patriarchy” as a Theoretical Tool. Violence Against Women, 15(5): 553-73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801208331246
Khalil, U., & Mookerjee, S. (2019). Patrilocal Residence and Women’s Social Status: Evidence from South Asia. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 67(2): 261-293. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/697584
Kohli, S. (2017). Gender inequality in India. International Journal of Humanities & Social Science Studies (IJHSSS), 3(4): 178-185.
Landale, N. S., Thomas, K. J. A., & Van Hook, J. (2011). The living arrangements of children of immigrants. Future Child, 21(1): 43-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/foc.2011.0003
Landmann, A., Seitz, H., & Steiner, S. (2017). Patrilocal Residence and Female Labor Supply. IZA Discussion Paper No. 10890. IZA – Institute of Labor Economics, 1705, 1-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3090259
Mayer, P. (2022). ‘They did not have to burn my sister alive’: Causes and Distribution by State of Dowry Murder in India. Dignity: A Journal of Analysis of Exploitation and Violence, 7(1): Article 9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23860/dignity.2022.07.01.09
Milan, A. (2016). Diversity of young adults living with their parents. Insights on Canadian Society. Statistics Canada. https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/75-006-x/2016001/article/14639-eng.htm [retrieved November 10, 2022]
Minnesota Population Center (2020). Integrated Public Use Microdata Series, International: Version 7.3 [USA, 2015, Canada, 2011 and India, 2009]. IPUMS.
Nadda, A., Malik, J. S., Rohilla, R., Chahal, S., Chayal, V., & Arora, V. (2018). Study of Domestic Violence among Currently Married Females of Haryana, India. Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine, 40(6): 534-539. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/IJPSYM.IJPSYM_62_18
Naved, R. T., & Persson, L. A. (2005). Factors associated with spousal physical violence against women in Bangladesh. Studies in family planning, 36(4): 289-300. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4465.2005.00071.x
Office for National Statistics (2012). UK Labour Force Survey, [2008-2012]. UK Data Service. SN: 6614.
Office for National Statistics (2020). Population and Migration Statistics. https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/populationandmigration [retrieved February 13, 2023]
Reyes, A. M. (2020). Mitigating poverty through the formation of extended family households: Race and ethnic differences. Social Problems, 67(4): 782-799. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/socpro/spz046
Saha, A. (2013). An assessment of gender discrimination in household expenditure on education in India. Oxford Development Studies, 41(2): 220-238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13600818.2013.786694
Seabright, E. et al. (2022). Repercussions of patrilocal residence on mothers’ social support networks among Tsimane forager–farmers. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 378(20210442). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2021.0442
Sekher, T.V., and Hatti, N. (2010). Unwanted daughters: Gender discrimination in modern India. Rawat Publications, 39(2): 315-319. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:142101133 [retrieved February 12, 2023]
Shirwadkar, S. (2004). Canadian Domestic Violence Policy and Indian Immigrant Women. Violence Against Women, 10(8): 860-879. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801204266310
Statistics Canada. (2021). Immigration and Ethnocultural Diversity Statistics. https://www.statcan.gc.ca/en/subjectsstart/immigration_and_ethnocultural_diversity [retrieved January 30 2023]
Stone, J., Berrington, A., & Falkingham, J. (2014). Gender, turning points, and boomerangs: Returning home in young adulthood in Great Britain. Demography, 51(1): 257-276. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-013-0247-8
Stromquist, N. P. (2015). Women’s Empowerment and Education. European Journal of Education, 50(3): 307-324. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12137
Treas, J., & Mazumdar, S. (2002). Older people in America's immigrant families: Dilemmas of dependence, integration, and isolation. Journal of Aging Studies, 16(3): 243-258. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0890-4065(02)00048-8
United States Department of Homeland Security. (2020). Yearbook of Immigration Statistics. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Office of Immigration Statistics. https://ohss.dhs.gov/topics/immigration/yearbook/2020 [retrieved January 30 2023]
Van Hook, J., & Glick, J. E. (2007). Immigration and living arrangements: Moving beyond economic need versus acculturation. Demography, 44(2): 225-249. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.2007.0019
World Economic Forum. (2019). Indian Diaspora Hits Record-Breaking Numbers. India Economic Summit. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2019/09/indian-diaspora-largest-in-world-numbers/ [retrieved January 30 2023]
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Funding data
-
Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades,Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades
Grant numbers RTI2018-096730-B-100
