Divergent rhythms of motherhood. Patterns of paid and unpaid work and domestic outsourcing among mothers in the United Kingdom and Western Germany

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20377/jfr-1054

Keywords:

gender, class, time-use, family policies, welfare state

Abstract

Objective: This article investigates class differences in mothers’ daily organization of paid and unpaid work, and how they are associated with domestic outsourcing in the United Kingdom and Western Germany.

Background: Operating hours of schools and daycare facilities often conflict with long working hours in high-skilled jobs and nonstandard working hours in low-skilled jobs. However, little is known on whether advantaged mothers rely on domestic outsourcing to resolve such scheduling conflicts, and how disadvantaged mothers reconcile their daily care responsibilities with paid work, depending on the welfare state context.

Method: The study uses sequence and cluster analyses on time-use data to identify typical patterns of paid and unpaid work (N=1,947). Regression models predict how these patterns differ by the mothers’ education and household income, and how they are associated with outsourcing housework and childcare.

Results: In both contexts, disadvantaged mothers were more likely to have unpaid workdays rather than nonstandard workdays. However, British advantaged mothers were considerably more likely to outsource childcare to pursue standard workdays. By contrast, the pattern of partial workdays in the morning, combined with more unpaid work allocation, prevailed among Western German mothers.

Conclusion: In the United Kingdom, more market-oriented as opposed to conservative family policies, stronger labor market deregulation, and more consistent policy incentives for domestic outsourcing seem more effective than in Western Germany in promoting advantaged mothers’ careers. However, this comes at the expense of greater class differences in how mothers organize their time.

References

Abraham, M., Nisic, N., Trübner, M., Walch, H., & Wunder, A. (2023). The role of generalized trust and control in the employment of domestic help: An experimental case study for Germany and the UK. Ra-tionality and Society, 36(2), 230-253. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10434631231213721

Aisenbrey, S., & Fasang, A. E. (2010). New life for old ideas: The ‘‘second wave’’ of sequence analysis bring-ing the ‘‘course’’ back into the life course. Sociological Methods & Research, 38(3), 420-462. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124109357532

Becker, G. S. (1991). A treatise on the family. Harvard University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674020665

Bianchi, S. M., Milkie, M. A., Sayer, L. C., & Robinson, J. P. (2000). Is anyone doing the housework? Trends in the gender division of household labor. Social Forces, 79(1), 191-228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/79.1.191

Bordone, V., Arpino, B., & Aassve, A. (2016). Patterns of grandparental child care across Europe: The role of the policy context and working mothers' need. Ageing and Society, 37(4), 845-873. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X1600009X

Carillo, D., Harknett, K., Logan, A., Luhr, S., & Schneider, D. (2017). Instability of work and care: How work schedules shape child-care arrangements for parents working in the service sector. Social Service Review, 91(3), 422-455. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/693750

Cheever, S. (2002). The nanny dilemma. In B. Ehrenreich & A. R. Hochschild (Eds.), Global women: Nan-nies, maids, and sex workers in the New Economy (pp. 31-38). Metropolitan Books.

Cheung, A. K.-L., & Lui, L. (2022). Does live-in domestic help reduce unpaid household labor? The paradox of intensive parenting and domestic outsourcing. Current Sociology, 70(6), 921-942. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00113921211012744

Chung, H., & van der Lippe, T. (2020). Flexible working, work-life balance, and gender equality: Introduc-tion. Social Indicators Research, 151(2), 365-381. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-018-2025-x

Cooke, L. P. (2011). Gender-class equality in political economies. Routledge.

Craig, L., & Powell, A. (2011). Non-standard work schedules, work-family balance and the gendered division of childcare. Work, Employment and Society, 25(2), 274-291. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017011398894

Daly, M. (2011a). Shifts in family policy in the UK under New Labour. Journal of European Social Policy, 20(5), 433-443. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928710380480

Daly, M. (2011b). What adult worker model? A critical look at recent social policy reform in Europe from a gender and family perspective. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 18(1), 1-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxr002

Daly, M., & Ferragina, E. (2018). Family policy in high-income countries: Five decades of development. Journal of European Social Policy, 28(3), 255-270. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928717735060

Daly, M., & Scheiwe, K. (2010). Individualisation and personal obligations: Social policy, family policy, and law reform in Germany and the UK. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 24(2), 177-197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/lawfam/ebq005

Deuflhard, C. (2023). Who benefits from an adult worker model? Gender inequality in couples’ daily time use in Germany across time and social classes. Socio-Economic Review, 21(3), 1391-1419. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwac065

Ehrenreich, B., & Hochschild, A. R. (2002). Introduction. In B. Ehrenreich & A. R. Hochschild (Eds.), Glob-al women: Nannies, maids, and sex workers in the New Economy (pp. 1-14). Metropolitan Books.

England, P. (2010). The gender revolution. Gender & Society, 24(2), 149-166. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243210361475

Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/095892879100100108

Esping-Andersen, G. (1999). Social foundations of postindustrial economies. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/0198742002.001.0001

Fasang, A. E., & Liao, T. F. (2014). Visualizing sequences in the social sciences. Sociological Methods & Re-search, 43(4), 643-676. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124113506563

Folbre, N. (2009). Varieties of patriarchal capitalism. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 16(2), 204-209. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxp011

For Quality. (2015). Quality of jobs and services in the personal care and household services sector in the United Kingdom. https://www.efsi-europe.eu/fileadmin/MEDIA/4Quality/National_reports/FOR_QUALITY_report_UK_eng_final.pdf [re-trieved September 15, 2024]

Gerstel, N., & Clawson, D. (2014). Class advantage and the gender divide: Flexibility on the job and at home. American Journal of Sociology, 120(2), 395-431. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/678270

Gerstel, N., & Clawson, D. (2015). Inequality in work time: Gender and class stratify hours and schedules, flexibility, and unpredictability in jobs and families. Sociology Compass, 9(12), 1094-1105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12332

Gonalons-Pons, P. (2015). Gender and class housework inequalities in the era of outsourcing hiring domes-tic work in Spain. Social Science Research, 52, 208-218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2015.01.008

Gracia, P., Han, W.-J., & Li, J. (2021). Nonstandard work schedules in 29 European countries, 2005–15: Dif-ferences by education, gender, and parental status. Monthly Labor Review, 0(0), 1-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21916/mlr.2021.17

Gupta, S. (2007). Autonomy, dependence, or display? The relationship between married women’s earnings and housework. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69(2), 399-417. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2007.00373.x

Harknett, K., Schneider, D., & Luhr, S. (2022). Who cares if parents have unpredictable work schedules? Just-in-time work schedules and child care arrangements. Social Problems, 69(1), 164-183. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/socpro/spaa020

Hays, S. (1996). The cultural contradictions of motherhood. Yale University Press.

Heisig, J. P. (2011). Who does more housework: Rich or poor? American Sociological Review, 76(1), 74-99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122410396194

Hook, J. L. (2015). Incorporating ‘class’ into work–family arrangements: Insights from and for three worlds. Journal of European Social Policy, 25(1), 14-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928714556968

Hook, J. L., & Li, M. (2020). Gendered tradeoffs. In R. Nieuwenhuis & W. Van Lancker (Eds.), The palgrave handbook of family policy (pp. 249-266). Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54618-2_11

Hook, J. L., & Paek, E. (2020). National family policies and mothers' employment: How earnings inequality shapes policy effects across and within countries. American Sociological Review, 85(3), 381-416. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122420922505

International Labor Organization (ILO). (2013). Domestic workers across the world: Global and regional statis-tics and the extent of legal protection. https://www.ilo.org/media/458491/download [retrieved September 15, 2024]

Kelly, E. L., Moen, P., Oakes, J. M., Fan, W., Okechukwu, C., Davis, K. D.,…Casper, L. M. (2014). Changing work and work-family conflict: Evidence from the work, family, and health network. American Sociologi-cal Review, 79(3), 485-516. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122414531435

Kilkey, M. (2010). Domestic-sector work in the UK: Locating men in the configuration of gendered care and migration regimes. Social Policy and Society, 9(3), 443-454. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746410000151

Lesnard, L. (2008). Off-scheduling within dual-earner couples: An unequal and negative externality for fami-ly time. American Journal of Sociology, 114(2), 447-490. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/590648

Lewis, J., Knijn, T., Martin, C., & Ostner, I. (2008). Patterns of development in work/family reconciliation policies for parents in France, Germany, the Netherlands, and the UK in the 2000s. Social Politics: Inter-national Studies in Gender, State & Society, 15(3), 261-286. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxn016

Lightman, N. (2021). Comparing care regimes: Worker characteristics and wage penalties in the global care chain. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 28(4), 971-998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxaa008

Lightman, N., & Kevins, A. (2021). “Women’s work”: Welfare state spending and the gendered and classed dimensions of unpaid care. Gender & Society, 35(5), 778-805. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/08912432211038695

Lyness, K. S., Gornick, J. C., Stone, P., & Grotto, A. R. (2012). It’s all about control: Worker control over schedule and hours in cross-national context. American Sociological Review, 77(6), 1023-1049. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122412465331

Mandel, H., & Semyonov, M. (2006). A welfare state paradox: State interventions and women’s employment opportunities in 22 countries. American Journal of Sociology, 111(6), 1910-1949. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/499912

Mandel, H., & Shalev, M. (2009). Gender, class, and varieties of capitalism. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 16(2), 161-181. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxp006

McGinnity, F., & McManus, P. (2007). Paying the price for reconciling work and family life: Comparing the wage penalty for women's part-time work in Britain, Germany and the United States. Journal of Com-parative Policy Analysis, 9(2), 115-134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13876980701311562

Morel, N. (2015). Servants for the knowledge-based economy? The political economy of domestic services in Europe. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 22(2), 170-192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxv006

Oropesa, R. S. (1993). Using the service economy to relieve the double burden: Female labor force participa-tion and service purchases. Journal of Family Issues, 14(3), 438-473. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/019251393014003006

Palenga-Möllenbeck, E. (2013). Care chains in Eastern and Central Europe: Male and female domestic work at the intersections of gender, class, and ethnicity. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies, 11(4), 364-383. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15562948.2013.822955

Palier, B., & Thelen, K. (2010). Institutionalizing dualism: Complementarities and change in France and Germany. Politics & Society, 38(1), 119-148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329209357888

Parente, C. d. M. D. (2020). Compared analysis of the school day in European Union countries. Cadernos de Pesquisa, 50(175), 78-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/198053146760

Presser, H. B. (2003). Working in a 24/7 economy: Challenges for American families. Russell Sage Foundation. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2004-822552

Raz‐Yurovich, L. (2014). A transaction cost approach to outsourcing by households. Population and Devel-opment Review, 40(2), 293-309. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2014.00674.x

Rubery, J., Grimshaw, D., Méhaut, P., & Weinkopf, C. (2022). Dualisation and part-time work in France, Germany and the UK: Accounting for within and between country differences in precarious work. Eu-ropean Journal of Industrial Relations, 0(0), 1-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/09596801221120468

Ruijter, E. d., & Lippe, T. v. d. (2009). Getting outside help. How trust problems explain household differ-ences in domestic outsourcing in the Netherlands. Journal of Family Issues, 30(1), 3-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X08324579

Schneider, D., & Hastings, O. P. (2017). Income inequality and household labor. Social Forces, 96(2), 481-506. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sox061

Schober, P. S., & Stahl, J. F. (2014). Trends in der Kinderbetreuung: sozioökonomische Unterschiede ver-stärken sich in Ost und West. DIW Wochenbericht, 40, 986-995.

Shire, K. A. (2015). Family supports and insecure work: The politics of household service employment in conservative welfare regimes. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 22(2), 193-219. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxv005

Studer, M., & Ritschard, G. (2016). What matters in differences between life trajectories: A comparative re-view of sequence dissimilarity measures. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Soci-ety, 179(3), 481-511. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/rssa.12125

Sullivan, O., & Gershuny, J. (2013). Domestic outsourcing and multitasking: How much do they really con-tribute? Social Science Research, 42(5), 1311-1324. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2013.05.004

Täht, K., & Mills, M. (2016). Out of time. Springer Netherlands. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7402-4

Thévenon, O. (2011). Family policies in OECD countries: A comparative analysis. Population and Develop-ment Review, 37(1), 57-87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2011.00390.x

Trappe, H., Pollmann-Schult, M., & Schmitt, C. (2015). The rise and decline of the male breadwinner mod-el: Institutional underpinnings and future expectations. European Sociological Review, 31(2), 230-242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcv015

Vagni, G. (2020). The social stratification of time use patterns. British Journal of Sociology, 71(4), 658-679. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12759

Vagni, G., & Cornwell, B. (2018). Patterns of everyday activities across social contexts. Proceedings of the Na-tional Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(24), 6183-6188. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1718020115

van Hooren, F. J. (2012). Varieties of migrant care work: Comparing patterns of migrant labour in social care. Journal of European Social Policy, 22(2), 133-147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928711433654

West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender and Society, 1(2), 125-151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243287001002002

Wight, V. R., Raley, S. B., & Bianchi, S. M. (2008). Time for children, one’s spouse and oneself among par-ents who work nonstandard hours. Social Forces, 87(1), 243-271. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.0.0092

Downloads

Published

2024-10-22

How to Cite

Deuflhard, C. (2024). Divergent rhythms of motherhood. Patterns of paid and unpaid work and domestic outsourcing among mothers in the United Kingdom and Western Germany. Journal of Family Research, 36, 351–372. https://doi.org/10.20377/jfr-1054

Issue

Section

Articles

Funding data