Who should have (no) children? Results of a vignette experiment in Switzerland
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20377/jfr-1188Keywords:
Heteronormalization, Heteronormativity, Factorial survey experiment, Assisted reproduction, LGBTIAQ+, family formationAbstract
Objective: In this study, we test whether same-sex couples and singles seeking to have a child by surrogacy or adoption are viewed more critically compared to different-sex couples. We rely on data from a factorial survey experiment run on a representative sample of the Swiss population.
Background: Empirical studies of attitudes towards non-normative reproduction often lack a theoretical foundation. Based on the concept of hegemonic heteronormativity and heteronormalization, our central thesis is that certain family types are subsumed into the norm, while others remain excluded.
Method: A factorial survey experiment on the acceptance of adoption and surrogacy for intended parents with differing relationship status and sexual orientation, income, education, age, and number of children in the family was conducted to test this assumption with 2,128 respondents from a representative sample of the Swiss population.
Results: The results show that same-sex couples have similar acceptance rates to female-male couples, while singles, older intended parents, and intended parents with low incomes are least accepted as adoptive parents. In general, there is a firm rejection of surrogacy and a low willingness to (even partially) fund either adoption or surrogacy publicly.
Conclusion: While we find a similar level of support for same-sex intended parents through adoption as different-sex couples, single, older, and low-income intended parents are less accepted by the Swiss population.
References
Adamoli, M. (2021). Familien in der Schweiz: Statistischer Bericht 2021. Statistik der Schweiz. 01, Bevölkerung.
Allen, S. H., & Mendez, S. N. (2018). Hegemonic heteronormativity: Toward a new era of queer family theory. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 10(1), 70–86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12241
Auspurg, K., Hinz, T., & Sauer, C. (2017). Why should women get less? Evidence on the gender pay gap from multifactorial survey experiments. American Sociological Review, 82(1), 179–210. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122416683393
Boso, L. (2025). Fear and hope for LGBTQ rights in the second Trump administration. Southwestern Law Review, 54(201), 201–213. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5116579
Brown, W. (2019). In the ruins of neoliberalism: The rise of antidemocratic politics in the west. The Wellek Library Lectures. Columbia University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7312/brow19384
Büchler, A., Rössel, J., Gilgen, S., Schroedter, J., Fritsch, L., Mertens, M., Peter-Spiess, M.-H., Christen, A., & Corba, E. (2023). CHARLS 2023 Swiss Assisted Reproduction Longitudinal Study. Human Reproduction Reloaded | H2R, Universität Zürich.
Butler, J. (2015/1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity (First issued in hardback). Routledge classics. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
Chamie, J., & Mirkin, B. (2011). Same-sex marriage: A new social phenomenon. Population and Development Review, 37(3), 529–551. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2011.00433.x
Cheng, S., Kelley, K., & Powell, B. (2023). One parent, two parents, one sex, two sexes: Public attitudes toward single and same‐sex parents. Journal of Marriage and Family, 85(2), 413–435. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12899
Dempsey, D., & Critchley, C. (2010). Comfort with use of assisted reproductive technologies (ART) for family formation by same-sex and heterosexual couples: a survey of Australian social attitudes. Gay and Lesbian Issues and Psychology Review, 6(2), 90–110.
Duggan, L. (2004). The twilight of equality? Neoliberalism, cultural politics, and the attack on democracy. Beacon Press.
Dutney, A. (2007). Religion, infertility and assisted reproductive technology. Best Practice & Research. Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 21(1), 169–180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2006.09.007
Ekman, M. (2022). The great replacement: Strategic mainstreaming of far-right conspiracy claims. Convergence, 28(4), 1127–1143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/13548565221091983
Engel, S. M. (2001). The unfinished revolution: Social movement theory and the gay and lesbian movement. Cambridge cultural social studies. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511520761
European Union (2014). Eu LGBT survey: European Union lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender survey; main results (Equality).
Fauser, B. C. J. M., Boivin, J., Barri, P. N., Tarlatzis, B. C., Schmidt, L., & Levy-Toledano, R. (2019). Beliefs, attitudes and funding of assisted reproductive technology: Public perception of over 6,000 respondents from 6 European countries. PLOS ONE, 14(1), Article e0211150, 1-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211150
Foucault, M. (2008). Security, territory, population: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1977 - 78 [Nachdr.]. Palgrave Macmillan.
Gilgen, S., & Stocker, M. (2024). Discrimination at the crossroads? Evidence from a factorial survey experiment on teacher‘s tracking decisions. Swiss Journal of Sociology, 48(1), 77–105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/sjs-2022-0005
Hartmannn, J., & Klesse, C. (2007). Heteronomativität. Empirische Studien zu Geschlecht, Sexualität und Macht - eine Einführung. In J. Hartmann, C. Klesse, P. Wagenknecht, B. Fritzsche, & K. Hackmann (Eds.), Studien Interdisziplinäre Geschlechterforschung: Band 10. Heteronormativität: Empirische Studien zu Geschlecht, Sexualität und Macht (1. Auflage, pp. 9–16). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-90274-6_1
Harzif, A. K., Santawi, V. P. A., & Wijaya, S. (2019). Discrepancy in perception of infertility and attitude towards treatment options: Indonesian urban and rural area. Reproductive Health, 16(1), Article 126, 1–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-019-0792-8
Havekes, E., Coenders, M., & van der Lippe, T. (2013). Positive or negative ethnic encounters in urban neighbourhoods? A photo experiment on the net impact of ethnicity and neighbourhood context on attitudes towards minority and majority residents. Social Science Research, 42(4), 1077–1091. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2013.02.002
Hayman, B., & Wilkes, L. (2017). De novo families: Lesbian motherhood. Journal of Homosexuality, 64(5), 577–591. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2016.1194119
Herrera, F., Teitelbom, B., Russo, M., Salas, S. P., & Zegers Hochschild, F. (2013). Encuesta de opinión pública sobre reproducción humana y usos de tecnología de reproducción asistida en habitantes de Santiago, Chile. Revista Medica De Chile, 141(7), 853–860. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0034-98872013000700004
Ho, J. R., Aghajanova, L., Mok-Lin, E., Hoffman, J. R., Smith, J. F., & Herndon, C. N. (2022). Public attitudes in the United States toward insurance coverage for in vitro fertilization and the provision of infertility services to lower income patients. F&S Reports, 3(2 Suppl), 122–129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xfre.2021.09.002
Höpflinger, F. (2021). Zwischen Ehesakrament und Liebesbeziehung: Zur Geschichte der Ehe in der Schweiz.
Horne, C., Dodoo, F. N.‑A., & Dodoo, N. D. (2013). The shadow of indebtedness: Bridewealth and norms constraining female reproductive autonomy. American Sociological Review, 78(3), 503–520. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122413484923
ILGA. (2023). criminalisation-consensual-same-sex_sexual-acts-ilga-world.png (PNG-Grafik, 8034 × 5676 Pixel) - Skaliert (9%).
Inglehart, R. F., Ponarin, E., & Inglehart, R. C. (2017). Cultural change, slow and fast: The distinctive trajectory of norms governing gender equality and sexual orientation. Social Forces, 95(4), 1313–1340. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sox008
Kahlert, H. (2008). "Nachhaltige Bevölkerungsentwicklung": Politische Steuerung der Generativität in postnaturalen Zeiten. In K.-S. Rehberg (Ed.), Verhandlungen des Deutschen Soziologentages: Vol. 33, Die Natur der Gesellschaft: Verhandlungen des 33. Kongresses der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Soziologie in Kassel 2006 (pp. 2288–2301). Campus Verlag.
Kleinewiese, J. (2022). New methodical findings on D-efficient factorial survey designs: Impacts of design resolution on aliasing and sample size. Methods, Data, Analyses, 16(2), 315–334.
Kováts, E. (2017). The Emergence of powerful anti-gender movements in Europe and the crisis of liberal democracy. In M. Köttig, R. Bitzan, & A. Petö (Eds.), Gender and Far Right Politics in Europe (pp. 175–189). Springer International Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43533-6_12
Kuhfeld, W. F. (2010, October 1). Marketing research methods in SAS: Experimental design, choice, conjoint, and graphical techniques.
Laufenberg, M. (2022). Queere Theorien zur Einführung. Zur Einführung. Junius.
Leibetseder, D., & Griffin, G. (2018). Introduction: Queer and trans reproduction with assisted reproductive technologies (ART), in Europe. Journal of International Women's Studies, 20(1), 1–9.
Ludwig, G. (2016). Desiring neoliberalism. Sexuality Research & Social Policy, 13(4), 417–427. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-016-0257-6
Massey, S. G., Merriwether, A. M., & Garcia, J. R. (2013). Modern prejudice and same-sex parenting: Shifting Judgments in positive and negative parenting situations. Journal of GLBT Family Studies, 9(2), 129–151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1550428X.2013.765257
Mitter, V., & Widmer, R. (2021). Ungleicher Zugang zur Fortpflanzungsmedizin in der Schweiz. Schweizerische Ärztezeitung, 102(6), 222–224. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4414/saez.2021.19491
Nay, Y. E. (2016). Feeling family: Affektive Paradoxien der Normalisierung von Regenbogenfamilien. Zaglossus e.U.
Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. (2019). Cultural backlash: Trump, Brexit, and authoritarian populism (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108595841
Präg, P., & Mills, M. C. (2017). Cultural determinants influence assisted reproduction usage in Europe more than economic and demographic factors. Human Reproduction (Oxford, England), 32(11), 2305–2314. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dex298
Raab, H. (2011). Sexuelle Politiken: Die Diskurse zum Lebenspartnerschaftsgesetz. Politik der Geschlechterverhältnisse: Vol. 45. Campus-Verl.
Riggs, D. W., & Due, C. (2018). Support for family diversity: a three-country study. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 36(2), 192–206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02646838.2018.1434491
Roberts, L. L. (2019). Changing worldwide attitudes toward homosexuality: The influence of global and region-specific cultures, 1981-2012. Social Science Research, 80, 114–131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2018.12.003
Ross, L., & Solinger, R. (2017). Reproductive justice: An introduction. Reproductive Justice: Vol. 1. University of California Press.
Rössel, J. (2006). Ronald Inglehart: Daten auf der Suche nach einer Theorie - Analysen des welweiten Wertewandels. In S. Moebius & D. Quadflieg (Eds.), Kultur: Theorien der Gegenwart (1. Auflage, pp. 545–556). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-90017-9_43
Rossi, P. H. (1979). Vignette analysis: Uncovering the normative structure of complex judgments. In R. K. Merton, J. S. Coleman, & P. H. Rossi (Eds.), Qualitative and quantitative social research: Papers in honor of Paul F. Lazarsfeld (pp. 176–186). Free Press.
Shreffler, K. M., Johnson, D. R., & Scheuble, L. K. (2010). Ethical problems with infertility treatments: Attitudes and explanations. The Social Science Journal, 47(4), 731–746. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2010.07.012
Skedgel, C., Ralphs, E., Finn, E., Whitty, J. A., Markert, M., & Samuelsen, C. (2021). Is the public supportive and willing to pay for a national assistive reproductive therapies programme? Results from a multicountry survey. BMJ Open, 11(3), Article e044986, 1-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044986
Steiner, P., Atzmüller, C., & Su, D. (2016). Designing valid and reliable vignette experiments for survey research: A case study on the fair gender income gap. Journal of Methods and Measurement in the Social Sciences, 7(2), 52–94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2458/v7i2.20321
Stöbel-Richter, Y., Goldschmidt, S., Brähler, E., Weidner, K., & Beutel, M. (2009). Egg donation, surrogate mothering, and cloning: attitudes of men and women in Germany based on a representative survey. Fertility and Sterility, 92(1), 124–130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.05.015
Szalma, I., & Bitó, T. (2021). Knowledge and attitudes about assisted reproductive technology: Findings from a Hungarian online survey. Reproductive Biomedicine & Society Online, 13, 75–84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbms.2021.06.005
Szalma, I., & Djundeva, M. (2020). What shapes public attitudes towards assisted reproduction technologies in Europe? Demográfia English Edition, 62(5), 45–75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21543/DEE.2019.2
Tobin, J. (1958). Estimation of relationships for limited dependent variables. Econometrica, 26(1), 24–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1907382
Turnbull-Dugarte, S. J. (2024). Fine for Adam & Eve but not Adam & Steve? Homonegativity bias, parasocial contact, and public support for surrogacy. Journal of European Public Policy, 31(2), 374–402. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2022.2154823
van der Toorn, J., Jost, J. T., Packer, D. J., Noorbaloochi, S., & van Bavel, J. J. (2017). In Defense of tradition: Religiosity, conservatism, and opposition to same-sex marriage in North America. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(10), 1455–1468. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167217718523
van der Toorn, J., Pliskin, R., & Morgenroth, T. (2020). Not quite over the rainbow: the unrelenting and insidious nature of heteronormative ideology. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 34, 160–165. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.03.001
van Oorschot, W. (2006). Making the difference in social Europe: Deservingness perceptions among citizens of European welfare states. Journal of European Social Policy, 16(1), 23–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928706059829
Wallander, L. (2009). 25 years of factorial surveys in sociology: A review. Social Science Research, 38(3), 505–520. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2009.03.004
Warner, M. (1991). Introduction: Fear of a Queer Planet(29), 3–17.
Webb, S. N., Chonody, J. M., & Kavanagh, P. S. (2017). Attitudes toward same-sex parenting: An effect of gender. Journal of Homosexuality, 64(11), 1583–1595. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2016.1247540
Weckemann, S. (2014). Viele Kinder, keine Arbeit: Mutterschaft als Anerkennungshoffnung und warum der Traum zerbrechlich ist [, Universität Köln]. DataCite.
Weissman, A. L. (2017). Repronormativity and the reproduction of the nation-state: The state and sexuality collide. Journal of GLBT Family Studies, 13(3), 277–305. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1550428X.2016.1210065
Wells, H., & Heinsch, M. (2020). Not yet a woman: The influence of socio-political constructions of motherhood on experiences of female infertility. The British Journal of Social Work, 50(3), 890–907. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcz077
Whitehead, A. L. (2010). Sacred rites and civil rights: Religion's effect on attitudes toward same-sex unions and the perceived cause of homosexuality. Social Science Quarterly, 91(1), 63–79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2010.00681.x
Williamson, L. E., & Lawson, K. L. (2021). Canadian support for IVF access and use. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada: JOGC = Journal D’obstetrique Et Gynecologie Du Canada: JOGC, 43(2), 175–181. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogc.2020.09.020
Williamson, M. (2023). A global analysis of transgender rights: Introducing the Trans Rights Indicator Project (TRIP). Perspectives on Politics, 1–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592723002827
Wolter, F., Raviv, O. C., & Mertens, M. (2023). Discriminatory residential preferences in Germany—A vignette study. KZfSS Kölner Zeitschrift Für Soziologie Und Sozialpsychologie, 75(3), 263–288. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11577-023-00906-2
Woltersdorff, V. (2019). Heteronormativitätskritik: ein Konzept zur kritischen Erforschung der Normalisierung von Geschlecht und Sexualität. In B. Kortendiek, B. Riegraf, & K. Sabisch (Eds.), Geschlecht und Gesellschaft. Handbuch Interdisziplinäre Geschlechterforschung (Vol. 65, pp. 323–330). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-12496-0_33
