Does early timing of first birth lead to lower earnings in midlife in Britain?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20377/jfr-1205Keywords:
age at first birth, BCS70, earnings, employment, human capital, midlife, United Kingdom, Britain, labor market attachmentAbstract
Objective: To examine the effect of the timing of a woman's first birth on her midlife earnings, and the potential mediators of this effect.
Background: While many studies demonstrate that motherhood substantially affects women’s wages and earnings, there is less research on the impact of the timing of entry into motherhood, particularly in the long term and in contexts outside the US.
Method: We analysed data on women who gave birth for the first time between the ages of 15 and 30, taken from the 1970 British Cohort Study. Within the framework of instrumental variable regression, our preferred specification utilised the occurrence of contraceptive failure as a source of exogenous variation in the age at first birth.
Results: We found tentative evidence that a higher age at first birth led to a higher probability of being employed in midlife. At the same time, a higher age at first birth reduced the earnings level of employed mothers in midlife. This was because a later first birth often resulted in mothers working part time rather than full time. Furthermore, a higher age at first birth decreased the time until the second birth, while increasing the probability of having a co-resident partner who could contribute to the household income.
Conclusion: These findings suggest that the impact of having an early first birth on earnings in midlife is not uniformly negative.
References
Albrecht, J. W., Edin, P.-A., Sundström, M., & Vroman, S. B. (1999). Career interruptions and subsequent earnings: A reexamination using Swedish data. Journal of Human Resources, 34(2): 294-311. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/146347
Amuedo-Dorantes, C., & Kimmel, J. (2005). The motherhood wage gap for women in the United States: The importance of college and fertility delay. Review of Economics of the Household, 3(1): 17-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11150-004-0978-9
Bailey, M. J., Hershbein, B., & Miller, A. R. (2012). The opt-in revolution? Contraception and the gender gap in wages. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 4(3): 225-54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/app.4.3.225
Baum, C. L. (2002). The efffect of work interruptions on women’s wages. Labour, 16(1): 1-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9914.00185
Bearak, J. M., Popinchalk, A., Burke, K. L., & Anjur-Dietrich, S. (2021). Does the impact of motherhood on women’s employment and wages differ for women who plan their transition into motherhood? Demography, 58(4): 1301-1325. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/00703370-9295218
Becker, G. S. (2009). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education. University of Chicago press.
Benard, S., & Correll, S. J. (2010). Normative discrimination and the motherhood penalty. Gender & Society, 24(5): 616-646. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243210383142
Berrington, A., Stone, J., & Beaujouan, E. (2015). Educational differences in timing and quantum of childbearing in Britain: A study of cohorts born 1940−1969. Demographic Research, 33(26): 733-764. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2015.33.26
Blackburn, M. L., Bloom, D. E., & Neumark, D. (1993). Fertility timing, wages, and human capital. Journal of Population Economics, 6(1): 1-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00164336
Blandhol, C., Bonney, J., Mogstad, M., & Torgovitsky, A. (2022). When is TSLS actually late? NBER Working Paper Series, No. w29709. National Bureau of Economic Research. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w29709
Bonjour, D., Cherkas, L. F., Haskel, J. E., Hawkes, D. D., & Spector, T. D. (2003). Returns to education: Evidence from UK twins. American Economic Review, 93(5): 1799-1812. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/000282803322655554
Braghieri, L., Levy, R., & Makarin, A. (2022). Social media and mental health. American Economic Review, 112(11): 3660-3693. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20211218
Bratti, M. (2015). Fertility postponement and labor market outcomes. IZA World of Labor 2015: 117.
Bratti, M., & Cavalli, L. (2014). Delayed first birth and new mothers’ labor market outcomes: Evidence from biological fertility shocks. European Journal of Population, 30(1): 35-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-013-9301-x
Bratti, M., & Tatsiramos, K. (2012). The effect of delaying motherhood on the second childbirth in Europe. Journal of Population Economics, 25(1): 291-321. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-010-0341-9
Brooks, R. (2012). Student-parents and higher education: A cross-national comparison. Journal of Education Policy, 27(3): 423-439. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2011.613598
Brown, M., Peters, A., Ploubidis, G., & Sachez, C. (2025). 1970 British Cohort Study. Response and deaths data. User guide (Version 6). UCL Centre for Longitudinal Studies.
Brzozowska, Z., Buber-Ennser, I., & Riederer, B. (2021). Didn’t plan one but got one: Unintended and sooner-than-intended parents in the East and the West of Europe. European Journal of Population, 37(3): 727-767. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-021-09584-2
Buckles, K. (2008). Understanding the returns to delayed childbearing for working women. American Economic Review, 98(2): 403-407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.98.2.403
Burgess, S., Gregg, P., Propper, C., & Washbrook, E. (2008). Maternity rights and mothers’ return to work. Labour Economics, 15(2): 168-201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2005.05.010
Cantalini, S., Härkönen, J., & Dahlberg, J. (2017). Does postponing pay off? Timing of parenthood, earnings trajectories, and earnings accumulation in Sweden 1990-2012. Stockholm Research Reports in Demography, No. 2017:24. Stockholm University.
Chandler, T. D., Kamo, Y., & Werbel, J. D. (1994). Do delays in marriage and childbirth affect earnings? Social Science Quarterly, 75(4): 838-853.
Chevalier, A., Viitanen, T. K., & Viitanen, T. K. (2003). The long-run labour market consequences of teenage motherhood in Britain. Journal of Population Economics, 16(2): 323-343. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s001480200125
Cooke, L. P. (2014). Gendered parenthood penalties and premiums across the earnings distribution in Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States. European Sociological Review, 30(3): 360-372. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcu044
Correll, S., Benard, S., & Paik, I. (2007). Getting a job: Is there a motherhood penalty? American Journal of Sociology, 112(5): 1297-1338. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/511799
Cukrowska-Torzewska, E., & Matysiak, A. (2020). The motherhood wage penalty: A meta-analysis. Social Science Research, 88-89(2020): 102416. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2020.102416
Cutright, P. (1973). Timing the first birth: Does it matter? Journal of Marriage and the Family, 35(4): 585-595. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/350869
Doren, C. (2019). Which mothers pay a higher price? Education differences in motherhood wage penalties by parity and fertility timing. Sociological Science, 6(2019): 684-709. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15195/v6.a26
Dumauli, M. T. (2019). The timing of childbirth and the child wage-penalty in Japan. International Journal of Social Economics, 46(12): 1369-1386. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSE-12-2018-0629
Elliott, J., & Shepherd, P. (2006). Cohort profile: 1970 British Birth Cohort (BCS70). International Journal of Epidemiology, 35(4): 836-843. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyl174
Ermisch, J. (2003). Does a “teen-birth” have longer-term impacts on the mother? Suggestive evidence from the British household panel study. ISER Working Paper Series, No. 2003-32. University of Essex, Institute for Social and Economic Research.
Ermisch, J., & Pevalin, D. J. (2005). Early motherhood and later partnerships. Journal of Population Economics, 18(2005): 469-489. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-004-0216-z
ESHRE. (2018). Why after 50 years of effective contraception do we still have unintended pregnancy? A European perspective. Human Reproduction, 33(5): 777-783. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dey089
Fitzenberger, B., Sommerfeld, K., & Steffes, S. (2013). Causal effects on employment after first birth — A dynamic treatment approach. Labour Economics, 25(C): 49-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2013.05.003
Frühwirth-Schnatter, S., Pamminger, C., Weber, A., & Winter-Ebmer, R. (2016). Mothers’ long-run career patterns after first birth. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 179(3): 707-725. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/rssa.12151
Gangl, M., & Ziefle, A. (2009). Motherhood, labor force behavior, and women’s careers: An empirical assessment of the wage penalty for motherhood in Britain, Germany, and the United states. Demography, 46(2): 341-369. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.0.0056
Geronimus, A. T., & Korenman, S. (1992). The socioeconomic consequences of teen childbearing reconsidered. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(4): 1187-1214. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2118385
Gipson, J. D., Koenig, M. A., & Hindin, M. J. (2008). The effects of unintended pregnancy on infant, child, and parental health: A review of the literature. Studies in Family Planning, 39(1): 18-38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4465.2008.00148.x
Gregg, P., Gutiérrez-Domènech, M., & Waldfogel, J. (2007). The employment of married mothers in Great Britain, 1974–2000. Economica, 74(296): 842-864. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0335.2006.00574.x
Harkness, S. E. (2016). The effect of motherhood and lone motherhood on the employment and earnings of British women: A lifecycle approach. European Sociological Review, 32(6): 850-863. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcw042
Herr, J. L. (2016). Measuring the effect of the timing of first birth on wages. Journal of Population Economics, 29(1): 39-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-015-0554-z
Hofferth, S. L. (1984). Long-term economic consequences for women of delayed childbearing and reduced family size. Demography, 21(2): 141-155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2061035
Hoffman, S. D., Foster, E. M., & Furstenberg, F. F. J. (1993). Reevaluating the costs of teenage childbearing. Demography, 30(1): 1-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2061843
Hotz, V. J., McElroy, S. W., & Sanders, S. G. (2005). Teenage childbearing and its life cycle consequences exploiting a natural experiment. Journal of Human Resources, 40(3): 683-715. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.XL.3.683
Human Fertility Database. (2024). Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research and Vienna Institute of Demography.
Hynes, K., & Clarkberg, M. (2005). Women’s employment patterns during early parenthood: A group‐based trajectory analysis. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67(1): 222-239. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-2445.2005.00017.x
Imai, K., Keele, L., & Tingley, D. (2010). A general approach to causal mediation analysis. Psychological Methods, 15(4): 309-334. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020761
Joshi, H. (2002). Production, reproduction, and education: Women, children, and work in a British perspective. Population and Development Review, 28(3): 445-474. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2002.00445.x
Kahn, J. R., García-Manglano, J., & Bianchi, S. M. (2014). The motherhood penalty at midlife: Long-term effects of children on women’s careers. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 76(1): 56-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12086
Karimi, A. (2014). Effects of the timing of births on women’s earnings: Evidence from a natural experiment. IFAU Working Paper, No. 2014:17. Institute for Evaluation of Labour Market and Education Policy.
Kaufman, G., & Uhlenberg, P. (2000). The influence of parenthood on the work effort of married men and women. Social Forces, 78(3): 931-947. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3005936
Kind, M., & Kleibrink, J. (2012). Time is money – The influence of parenthood timing on wages. SOEP Papers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research, No. 467. Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2135446
Kleven, H., Landais, C., & Søgaard, J. E. (2019). Children and gender inequality: Evidence from Denmark. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 11(4): 181-209. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/app.20180010
Lakha, F., & Glasier, A. (2006). Unintended pregnancy and use of emergency contraception among a large cohort of women attending for antenatal care or abortion in Scotland. The Lancet, 368(9549): 1782-1787. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69737-7
Landivar, L. C. (2020). First-birth timing and the motherhood wage gap in 140 occupations. Socius, 6(2020): 1-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023120939424
Leung, M. Y. M., Groes, F., & Santaeulalia-Llopis, R. (2016). The relationship between age at first birth and mother’s lifetime earnings: Evidence from Danish data. Plos One, 11(1): 1-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146989
Lewis, J., & Campbell, M. (2007). UK work/family balance policies and gender equality, 1997–2005. Social Politics, 14(1): 4-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxm005
Lundborg, P., Plug, E., & Rasmussen, A. W. (2017). Can women have children and a career? IV evidence from IVF treatments. American Economic Review, 107(6): 1611-1637. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20141467
Lyonette, C., Atfield, G., Behle, H., & Gambin, L. (2015). Tracking student mothers’ higher education participation and early career outcomes over time: initial choices and aspirations, HE experiences and career destinations. Institute for Employment Research, University of Warwick.
Matysiak, A., Kurowska, A., & Pavelea, A. M. (2024). His unemployment, her response, and the moderating role of welfare policies in European countries. Results from a preregistered study. Plos One, 19(8): e0306964. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0306964
Matysiak, A., & Vignoli, D. (2008). Fertility and women’s employment: A meta-analysis. European Journal of Population, 24(4): 363-384. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-007-9146-2
Miller, A. R. (2011). The effects of motherhood timing on career path. Journal of Population Economics, 24(3): 1071-1100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-009-0296-x
Mills, M., Rindfuss, R. R., McDonald, P., & te Velde, E. (2011). Why do people postpone parenthood? Reasons and social policy incentives. Human Reproduction Update, 17(6): 848-860. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmr026
Mincer, J., & Ofek, H. (1982). Interrupted work careers: Depreciation and restoration of human capital. The Journal of Human Resources, 17(1): 3-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/145520
Mincer, J., & Polachek, S. (1974). Family investments in human capital: Earnings of women. Journal of Political Economy, 82(2, Part 2): S76-S108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/260293
Misra, J., Budig, M. J., & Moller, S. (2007). Reconciliation policies and the effects of motherhood on employment, earnings and poverty. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 9(2): 135-155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13876980701311588
Muller, J. S., Hiekel, N., & Liefbroer, A. C. (2020). The long-term costs of family trajectories: Women’s later-life employment and earnings across Europe. Demography, 57(3): 1007-1034. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-020-00874-8
Musick, K., England, P., Edgington, S., & Kangas, N. (2009). Education differences in intended and unintended fertility. Social Forces, 88(2): 543-572. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.0.0278
Nisén, J., Bijlsma, M., Martikainen, P., Wilson, B., & Myrskylä, M. (2022). The gendered impacts of delayed parenthood: A dynamic analysis of young adulthood. Advances in Life Course Research, 53(2022): 100496. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alcr.2022.100496
OECD. (2020). Is childcare affordable? Policy brief on employment, labour and social affairs. OECD.
ONS. (2022). Births by parents’ characteristics. UK Office for National Statistics (ONS). ONS.
Picchio, M., Pigini, C., Staffolani, S., & Verashchagina, A. (2021). If not now, when? The timing of childbirth and labour market outcomes. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 36(5): 663-685. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.2838
Putz, T., & Engelhardt, H. (2014). The effects of the first birth timing on women’s wages: A longitudinal analysis based on the German Socio-Economic Panel. Zeitschrift für Familienforschung | Journal of Family Research, 26(3): 302-330. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3224/zff.v26i3.18990
Ribar, D. C. (1999). The socioeconomic consequences of young women’s childbearing: Reconciling disparate evidence. Journal of Population Economics, 12(4): 547-565. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s001480050113
Robinson, H. (2003). Are you experienced? British evidence on age-earnings profiles. Applied Economics, 35(9): 1101-1115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0003684032000082059
Rosenbaum, P. (2021). Pregnancy or motherhood cost? A comparison of the child penalty for adopting and biological parents. Applied Economics, 53(29): 3408-3422. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2021.1881431
Sigle-Rushton, W. (2008). England and Wales: Stable fertility and pronounced social status differences. Demographic Research, 19(15): 455-502. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2008.19.15
Simoni, M. K., Mu, L., & Collins, S. C. (2017). Women’s career priority is associated with attitudes towards family planning and ethical acceptance of reproductive technologies. Human Reproduction, 32(10): 2069-2075. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dex275
Słoczyński, T. (2020). When should we (not) interpret linear IV estimands as LATE? ArXiv Preprint ArXiv:2011.06695. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3846693
StataCorp. (2023). Stata Statistical Software: Release 17. StataCorp LLC.
Sullivan, A., Brown, M., Hamer, M., & Ploubidis, G. B. (2023). Cohort profile update: The 1970 British cohort study (BCS70). International Journal of Epidemiology, 52(3): e179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyac148
Taniguchi, H. (1999). The timing of childbearing and women’s wages. Journal of Marriage and Family, 61(4): 1008-1019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/354020
Troske, K. R., & Voicu, A. (2013). The effect of the timing and spacing of births on the level of labor market involvement of married women. Empirical Economics, 45(1): 483-521. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-012-0620-2
Waldfogel, J. (1995). The price of motherhood: Family status and women’s pay in a young British cohort. Oxford Economic Papers, 47(4): 584-610. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.oep.a042189
Waldfogel, J. (1998a). The family gap for young women in the United States and Britain: Can maternity leave make a difference? Journal of Labor Economics, 16(3): 505-545. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/209897
Waldfogel, J. (1998b). Understanding the ‘family gap’in pay for women with children. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12(1): 137-156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.12.1.137
Waldfogel, J., Higuchi, Y., & Abe, M. (1999). Family leave policies and women’s retention after childbirth: Evidence from the United States, Britain, and Japan. Journal of Population Economics, 12(1999): 523-545. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s001480050112
Wellings, K., Jones, K. G., Mercer, C. H., Tanton, C., Clifton, S., Datta, J., "…" & Johnson, A. M. (2013). The prevalence of unplanned pregnancy and associated factors in Britain: Findings from the third National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles (Natsal-3). The Lancet, 382(9907): 1807-1816. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62071-1
Wellings, K., Nanchahal, K., Macdowall, W., McManus, S., Erens, B., Mercer, C. H., "…" & Field, J. (2001). Sexual behaviour in Britain: Early heterosexual experience. The Lancet, 358(9296): 1843-1850. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(01)06885-4
Wilde, T. E., Batchelder, L., & Ellwood, D. T. (2010). The mommy track divides: The impact of childbearing on wages of women of differing skill levels. NBER Working Paper Series, No. 16582. National Bureau of Economic Research. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w16582
Zabel, C. (2009). Eligibility for maternity leave and first birth timing in Great Britain. Population Research and Policy Review, 28(3): 251-270. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-008-9098-1
Zagel, H. (2014). Are all single mothers the same? Evidence from British and West German women’s employment trajectories. European Sociological Review, 30(1): 49-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jct021
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Funding data
-
Research Council of Finland
Grant numbers 332863; 320162 -
Strategic Research Council
Grant numbers 345130
