Attitudes towards interethnic partnerships with refugees: Evidence from a factorial survey experiment in Germany
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20377/jfr-1206Keywords:
interethnic partnerships, cultural distance, type of partnership, Syrian and Afghan refugeesAbstract
Objective: The study examines the patterns of attitudes towards interethnic partnerships with refugees from Syria and Afghanistan within the German majority population.
Background: In 2015/16, Germany experienced a significant influx of refugees, primarily from Syria and Afghanistan - countries that are culturally distant from Germany. The majority of these refugees were in their prime partnership-forming ages, and might seek relationships within the German population. However, the success of their efforts to form partnerships is influenced by the broader social context they are embedded in.
Method: Using a factorial survey experiment conducted within wave 58 of the German Internet Panel, we specifically examine the role of cultural distance and the type of partnership for the acceptance of respondents’ relatives engaging in interethnic partnerships with refugees.
Results: Our findings indicate that refugees who are Christian, less religious, of Syrian compared to Afghan origin, and possess higher education are more likely to be accepted as partners. Partnerships with refugees tend to be more accepted if they involve lower levels of commitment (like non-marital partnerships). However, as the level of commitment increases, cultural factors become more important in shaping the acceptance of partnerships with refugees.
Conclusion: The study reveals that the acceptance of partnerships with refugees heavily depends on both their cultural closeness to the host society and the closeness of the romantic relationship.
References
Auspurg, K., & Hinz, T. (2015). Factorial survey experiments. Series: Quantitative applications in the social sciences. SAGE Publications. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483398075
BAMF. (2017). Das Bundesamt in Zahlen 2016. Asyl, Migration und Integration. Bundesamt für Migration und Flüchtlinge (BAMF).
Bansak, K., Hainmueller, J., & Hangartner, D. (2016). How economic, humanitarian, and religious concerns shape European attitudes toward asylum seekers. Science, 354(6309): 217–222. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aag2147
Bevelander, P., & Otterbeck, J. (2010). Young people’s attitudes towards Muslims in Sweden. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 33(3): 404–425. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870802346048
Blackwell, D.L., & Lichter, D.T. (2004). Homogamy among dating, cohabiting, and married couples. The Sociological Quarterly, 45(4): 719–737. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.2004.tb02311.x
Blom, A.G., Fikel, M., Friedel, S., Krieger, U., Rettig, T., & SFB 884 ´Political Economy of Reforms´ University of Mannheim. (2024). German Internet Panel, wave 49—Core study (September 2020) (GESIS, Cologne. ZA7646 Data File Version 1.1.0 [Dataset]).
Blom, A.G., Gathmann, C., & Krieger, U. (2015). Setting up an online panel representative of the general population: The German Internet Panel. Field Methods, 27(4): 391–408. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X15574494
Blom, A.G., Gonzalez Ocanto, M., Krieger, U., Rettig, T., Ungefucht, M., & SFB 884 ´Political Economy of Reforms´ University of Mannheim. (2022). German Internet Panel, Wave 58 (March 2022) (GESIS, Cologne. ZA7878 Data File Version 1.0.0 [Dataset]).
Bobo, L. (1983). Whites’ opposition to busing: Symbolic racism or realistic group conflict? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(6): 1196–1210. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.45.6.1196
Braack, M.K., & Milewski, N. (2019). A different perspective on exogamy: Are non-migrant partners in mixed unions more liberal in their attitudes toward gender, family, and religion than other natives? Journal of Family Research, 31(3): 361–386. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3224/zff.v31i3.06
Brücker, H., Ehab, M., Jaschke, P., & Kosyakova, Y. (2024). Labor market integration of refugees. Improved institutional settings promote employment. IAB-Kurzbericht No. 10
Brücker, H., Ette, A., Grabka, M.M., Kosyakova, Y., Niehues, W., Rother, N., …, & Tanis, K. (2023). Ukrainian refugees in Germany: Escape, arrival and everyday life. IAB-Forschungsbericht No. 24/2022en
Brücker, H., Kosyakova, Y., & Schuß, E. (2020). Integration in Arbeitsmarkt und Bildungssystem macht weitere Fortschritte. IAB-Kurzbericht No. 4
Brücker, H., Rother, N., Schupp, J., Gostomski, C.B., Böhm, A., Fendel, T., … Vallizadeh, E. (2016). Forced migration, arrival in Germany, and first steps toward integration. DIW Economic Bulletin, 6(48): 541–556.
Buunk, A.P., & Dijkstra, P. (2017). Sex and marriage with members of other ethnic groups: A study in the Netherlands. Cross-Cultural Research, 51(1): 3–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1069397116677958
Buunk, A.P., Pollet, T.V., & Dubbs, S. (2012). Parental control over mate choice to prevent marriages with out-group members: A study among mestizos, Mixtecs, and Blacks in Mexico. Human Nature, 23(3): 360–374. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-012-9149-5
Carol, S. (2013). Intermarriage attitudes among minority and majority groups in Western Europe: The role of attachment to the religious in-group. International Migration, 51(3): 67–83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.12090
Casier, M., Heyse, P., Clycq, N., Zemni, S., & Timmerman, C. (2013). Breaking the in-group out-group: Shifting boundaries in transnational partner choice processes of individuals of Moroccan, Tunisian, Algerian, Turkish, Punjabi Sikh, Pakistani and Albanian descent in Belgium. The Sociological Review, 61(3): 460–478. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.12029
Ceobanu, A.M., & Escandell, X. (2010). Comparative analyses of public attitudes toward immigrants and immigration using multinational survey data: A review of theories and research. Annual Review of Sociology, 36(1): 309–328. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102651
Coenders, M., Lubbers, M., Scheepers, P., & Verkuyten, M. (2008). More than two decades of changing ethnic attitudes in the Netherlands. Journal of Social Issues, 64(2): 269–285. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2008.00561.x
Czymara, C.S. (2021). Attitudes toward refugees in contemporary Europe: A longitudinal perspective on cross-national differences. Social Forces, 99(3): 1306–1333. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soaa055
Czymara, C.S., & Schmidt-Catran, A.W. (2016). Wer ist in Deutschland Willkommen?: Eine Vignettenanalyse zur Akzeptanz von Einwanderern. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 68(2): 193–227. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11577-016-0361-x
Czymara, C.S., & Schmidt-Catran, A.W. (2017). Refugees unwelcome? Changes in the public acceptance of immigrants and refugees in Germany in the course of Europe’s ‘immigration crisis.’ European Sociological Review, 33(6): 735–751. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcx071
De Coninck, D. (2020). Migrant categorizations and European public opinion: Diverging attitudes towards immigrants and refugees. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 46(9): 1667–1686. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2019.1694406
Deiss-Helbig, E., & Remer, U. (2022). Does the local presence of asylum seekers affect attitudes toward asylum seekers? Results from a natural experiment. European Sociological Review, 38(2): 219–233. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcab036
Dunn, K.M., Diallo, T.M.O., & Sharples, R. (2021). Segmenting anti-Muslim sentiment in Australia: Insights for the diverse project of countering Islamophobia. Ethnicities, 21(3): 538–562. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1468796821989819
Esser, H. (2006). Migration, language and integration. Series: Programme on intercultural conflicts and societal integration (AKI). WZB Social Science Research Center Berlin.
Esser, H. (2009). Pluralisierung oder Assimilation? Effekte der multiplen Inklusion auf die Integration von Migranten. Zeitschrift Für Soziologie, 38(5): 358–378. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/zfsoz-2009-0502
FitzGerald, D.S., & Arar, R. (2018). The sociology of refugee migration. Annual Review of Sociology, 44(1): 387–406. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-073117-041204
Ford, R. (2011). Acceptable and unacceptable immigrants: How opposition to immigration in Britain is affected by migrants’ region of origin. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 37(7): 1017–1037. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2011.572423
Ford, R., & Mellon, J. (2020). The skills premium and the ethnic premium: A cross-national experiment on European attitudes to immigrants. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 46(3): 512–532. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2018.1550148
Frey, A. (2021). Getting under the skin: The impact of terrorist attacks on native and immigrant sentiment. Social Forces, 101(2): 943–973. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soab135
German Internet Panel, University of Mannheim. (2024). German Internet Panel, wave 61—Core study (September 2022) (GESIS, Cologne. ZA7881 Data File Version 1.0.0 [Dataset]).
Goldin, C., & Katz, L.F. (2000). Decreasing (and then increasing) inequality in America: A tale of two half-centuries. In F. Welch (Ed.), The causes and consequences of increasing inequality (pp. 37–82). University of Chicago Press.
Gopalkrishnan, N., & Babacan, H. (2007). Ties that bind: Marriage and partner choice in the Indian community in Australia in a transnational context. Identities, 14(4): 507–526. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10702890701578498
Hainmueller, J., & Hiscox, M.J. (2007). Educated preferences: Explaining attitudes toward immigration in Europe. International Organization, 61(02): 399–442. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818307070142
Hainmueller, J., & Hopkins, D.J. (2015). The hidden American immigration consensus: A conjoint analysis of attitudes toward immigrants. American Journal of Political Science, 59(3): 529–548. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12138
Hangartner, D., Dinas, E., Marbach, M., Matakos, K., & Xefteris, D. (2019). Does exposure to the refugee crisis make natives more hostile? American Political Science Review, 113(2): 442–455. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055418000813
Heaton, T.B., & Pratt, E.L. (1990). The effects of religious homogamy on marital satisfaction and stability. Journal of Family Issues, 11(2): 191–207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/019251390011002005
Helbling, M. (2014). Opposing Muslims and the Muslim headscarf in Western Europe. European Sociological Review, 30(2): 242–257. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jct038
Helbling, M., & Traunmüller, R. (2020). What is Islamophobia? Disentangling citizens’ feelings toward ethnicity, religion and religiosity using a survey experiment. British Journal of Political Science, 50(3): 811–828. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123418000054
Herman, M.R., & Campbell, M.E. (2012). I wouldn’t, but you can: Attitudes toward interracial relationships. Social Science Research, 41(2): 343–358. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2011.11.007
Heyne, S., Kuhlemann, J., & Kogan, I. (Forthcoming). Cultural distance through the lens of social closeness and individual experiences with diversity: Unveiling attitudes toward recent immigrants in Germany using a factorial survey experiment. Soziale Welt, forthcoming.
Huijnk, W., Verkuyten, M., & Coenders, M. (2010). Intermarriage attitude among ethnic minority and majority groups in the Netherlands: The role of family relations and immigrant characteristics. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 41(3): 389–414. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3138/jcfs.41.3.389
Huijnk, W., Verkuyten, M., & Coenders, M. (2013). Family relations and the attitude towards ethnic minorities as close kin by marriage. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 36(11): 1890–1909. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2012.699086
Inglehart, R., & Baker, W.E. (2000). Modernization, cultural change, and the persistence of traditional values. American Sociological Review, 65(1): 19–51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240006500103
Iyengar, S., Jackman, S., Messing, S., Valentino, N., Aalberg, T., Duch, R., … , & Kobayashi, T. (2013). Do attitudes about immigration predict willingness to admit individual immigrants? A cross-national test of the person-positivity bias. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 77(3): 641–665. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nft024
Jungkunz, S., Helbling, M., & Schwemmer, C. (2019). Xenophobia before and after the Paris 2015 attacks: Evidence from a natural experiment. Ethnicities, 19(2): 271–291. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1468796818757264
Kalmijn, M. (1991). Status homogamy in the United States. American Journal of Sociology, 97(2): 496–523. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/229786
Kalmijn, M. (1998). Intermarriage and homogamy: Causes, patterns, trends. Annual Review of Sociology, 24(1): 395–421. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.395
Kalmijn, M., de Graaf, P., & Janssen, J. (2005). Intermarriage and the risk of divorce in the Netherlands: The effects of differences in religion and in nationality, 1974-1994. Population Studies-A Journal of Demography, 59(1): 71–85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0032472052000332719
Kalter, F. (2008). Stand, Herausforderungen und Perspektiven der empirischen Migrationsforschung. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, Special Issue 48: 11–36.
Kinder, D.R., & Sears, D.O. (1981). Prejudice and politics: Symbolic racism versus racial threats to the good life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40(3): 414–431. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.40.3.414
Kogan, I., Dollmann, J., & Weißmann, M. (2021). In the ear of the listener: The role of foreign accent in interethnic friendships and partnerships. International Migration Review, 55(3): 746–784. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0197918320988835
Kogan, I., & Kalter, F. (2020). An empirical–analytical approach to the study of recent refugee migrants in Germany. Soziale Welt, 71(1–2): 3–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/0038-6073-2020-1-2-3
Kosyakova, Y., & Kogan, I. (2022). Labor market situation of refugees in Europe: The role of individual and contextual factors. Frontiers in Political Science, 4(977764): 1–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2022.977764
Lehrer, E.L., & Chiswick, C.U. (1993). Religion as a determinant of marital stability. Demography, 30(3): 385–404. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2061647
Maddox, A. (2019). Parental influence on the ethnic partner choice within immigrant families in Europe. University of Mannheim.
Meidert, N., & Rapp, C. (2019). Public attitudes towards refugees in Germany: What drives attitudes towards refugees in comparison with immigrant workers from European Union countries? Journal of Refugee Studies, 32(Special Issue No. 1): i209–i218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/fez046
Milewski, N., & Kulu, H. (2014). Mixed marriages in Germany: A high risk of divorce for immigrant-native couples. European Journal of Population, 30(1): 89–113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-013-9298-1
Munniksma, A., Flache, A., Verkuyten, M., & Veenstra, R. (2012). Parental acceptance of children’s intimate ethnic outgroup relations: The role of culture, status, and family reputation. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 36(4): 575–585. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2011.12.012
Nauck, B. (2008). Binationale Paare. In K. Lenz & F. Nestmann (Eds.), Handbuch Persönliche Beziehungen (pp. 695–714). Juventa.
OECD. (2017). Finding their way: The labour market integration of refugees in Germany. OECD, International Migration Division, Directorate for Employment, Labour and Social Affairs. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/14947519-en
Raijman, R., & Semyonov, M. (2004). Perceived threat and exclusionary attitudes towards foreign workers in Israel. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 27(5): 780–799. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0141987042000246345
Rippl, S., & Seipel, C. (2023). Rassismus und migrationsfeindliche Einstellungen in Deutschland. In A. Röder & D. Zifonun (Eds.), Handbuch Migrationssoziologie (pp. 1–29). Springer Fachmedien. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-20773-1_29-1
Schwartz, C.R., & Mare, R.D. (2005). Trends in educational assortative marriage from 1940 to 2003. Demography, 42(4): 621–646. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.2005.0036
Sherif, M. (1966). Group conflict and cooperation: Their social psychology. Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Sherif, M., & Sherif, C.W. (1953). Groups in harmony and tension: An integration of studies of intergroup relations. Harper & Brothers.
Sniderman, P.M., Hagendoorn, L., & Prior, M. (2004). Predisposing factors and situational triggers: Exclusionary reactions to immigrant minorities. American Political Science Review, 98(1): 35–49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S000305540400098X
Spruyt, B., & Elchardus, M. (2012). Are anti-Muslim feelings more widespread than anti-foreigner feelings? Evidence from two split-sample experiments. Ethnicities, 12(6): 800–820. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1468796812449707
Stephan, W.G., & Stephan, C.W. (2000). An integrated threat theory of prejudice. In S. Oskamp (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination (pp. 23–45). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Stephan, W.G., & Stephan, C.W. (2018). Intergroup threat theory. In Y.Y. Kim (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of intercultural communication (pp. 1–12). Wiley Blackwell. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118783665.ieicc0162
Stephan, W.G., Ybarra, O., & Rios, K. (2016). Intergroup threat theory. In T.D. Nelson (Ed.), Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination (2nd ed., pp. 255–278). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Strabac, Z., Aalberg, T., & Valenta, M. (2014). Attitudes towards Muslim immigrants: Evidence from survey experiments across four countries. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 40(1): 100–118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2013.831542
Tajfel, H. (1981). Human groups and social categories: Studies in social psychology. Cambridge University Press.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J.C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W.G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Nelson-Hall.
Turper, S., Iyengar, S., Aarts, K., & van Gerven, M. (2015). Who is less welcome?: The impact of individuating cues on attitudes towards immigrants. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 41(2): 239–259. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2014.912941
UNDP. (2022). Human development report 2021-22: Uncertain times, unsettled lives: Shaping our future in a transforming world. United Nations Development Programme.
Vasquez, J.M. (2015). Disciplined preferences: Explaining the (re)production of Latino endogamy. Social Problems, 62(3): 455–475. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/socpro/spv011
Von Hermanni, H., & Neumann, R. (2019). ‘Refugees welcome?’ The interplay between perceived threats and general concerns on the acceptance of refugees – A factorial survey approach in Germany. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 45(3): 349–374. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2018.1459183
Ward, D.G. (2019). Public attitudes toward young immigrant men. American Political Science Review, 113(1): 264–269. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055418000710
West, K. (2020). Interethnic bias in willingness to engage in casual sex versus committed relationships. The Journal of Sex Research, 57(4): 409–420. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2018.1546372
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Funding data
-
European Research Council
Grant numbers No. 864683
