Exploring the full spectrum of reproductive experiences
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20377/jfr-1224Keywords:
live birth, stillbirth, miscarriages, induced abortions, infertility treatment, CzechiaAbstract
Objective: The study examines changes across cohorts in terms of the timing and frequency of the full spectrum of reproductive events and explores whether these reproductive trajectories reflect broader trends towards the destandardisation of family formation. Furthermore, the study assesses the quality and limitations of Czech health registry data by comparing them with official vital statistics.
Background: Analysing fertility alone is insufficient with respect to understanding individual reproductive trajectories since reproductive experiences are interconnected across the lifespan and may be influenced by other reproductive events that affect both the tempo and the quantum - especially within the context of fertility postponement.
Method: This study employs individual data obtained from the Czech National Health Information System (NHIS) that enable the holistic analysis of reproductive trajectories including live births, induced abortions, in vitro fertilisation, miscarriages and stillbirths across selected cohorts of women (1976–1991).
Results: The younger cohorts experienced delayed and less frequent reproductive events. However, the lower incidence of adverse events partly reflected fewer conceptions due to the postponement of reproduction to older ages. The most common combination of event types involved live births with induced abortions or miscarriages. Reproductive trajectories were found to diversify with age but exhibited limited variation across the cohorts, and an early live birth remained linked to higher completed fertility. The NHIS data were largely in line with the vital statistics, with the moderate underestimation of live births and the under-reporting of early miscarriages and induced abortions.
Conclusion: The findings highlight the potential and limitations of health registry data in terms of capturing the full spectrum of reproductive events. Forming a deeper understanding of women's reproductive trajectories and experiences, enabled via the use of linked health register data, is essential in terms of developing policies on reproductive health and rights in the context of declining fertility levels and the postponement of childbearing to later ages.
References
Aassve, A., Billari, F. C., & Piccarreta, R. (2007). Strings of adulthood: A sequence analysis of young British women’s work-family trajectories. European Journal of Population, 23(3): 369–388. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-007-9134-6
Balasch, J. (2010). Ageing and infertility: an overview. Gynecological Endocrinology, 26(12): 855-860. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/09513590.2010.501889
Beaujouan, E., & Berghammer, C. (2019). The gap between lifetime fertility intentions and completed fertility in Europe and the United States: A cohort approach. Population Research and Policy Review, 38(4): 507–535. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-019-09516-3
Beaujouan, E., Zeman, K. & Nathan, M. (2023). Delayed first births and completed fertility across the 1940-1969 birth cohorts. Demographic Research, 48: 387-420. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2023.48.15
Billari, F. C., Liefbroer, A. C., & Philipov, D. (2006). The postponement of childbearing in Europe: Driving forces and implications. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, 1-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1553/populationyearbook2006s1
Burgio, A., Castagnaro, C., Vignoli, D. & Vitali, A. (2025). The contribution of medically assisted reproduction to total, age-, and parity-specific fertility in Italy. Human Reproduction, 40(10): 1972–1979. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deaf137
Chester, M. R., Tirlapur, A. & Jayaprakasan, K. (2022). Current management of recurrent pregnancy loss. The Obstetrician & Gynaecologist, 24: 260–71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/tog.12832
Chaloupková, J. (2010). The de-standardisation of early family trajectories in the Czech Republic: A cross-cohort comparison. Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review, 46(3): 427-452. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13060/00380288.2010.46.3.05
CZSO (Czech Statistical Office). (2023). Population Development of Czechia – 2022. Chapter 6: Migration.
CZSO (Czech Statistical Office). (2025a). Demographic Yearbook of the Czech Republic – 1919 to 2023.
CZSO (Czech Statistical Office). (2025b). Public database. Obyvatelstvo podle pohlaví a podle druhu pobytu, státního občanství, národnosti, způsobu bydlení a náboženského vyznání (Population by sex and by type of residence, citizenship, nationality, type of housing, and religious affiliation).
ESHRE Capri Workshop Group. (2005). Fertility and ageing. Human Reproduction Update, 11(3): 261–276 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmi006
Feodor Nilsson, S., Andersen, P.K., Strandberg-Larsen, K. & Nybo Andersen, A-M. (2014). Risk factors for miscarriage from a prevention perspective: a nationwide follow-up study. BJOG, 121: 1375–1385. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.12694
Frejka, T. (2008). Overview Chapter 3: Birth regulation in Europe. Demographic Research, 19: 73–84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2008.19.5
Goisis, A., Remes, H., Martikainen, P., Klemetti, R., Myrskylä, M. (2019). Medically assisted reproduction and birth outcomes: a within-family analysis using Finnish population registers. Lancet, 393(10177):1225-1232. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31863-4
Harknett, K., & Hartnett, C. S. (2014). The gap between births intended and births achieved in 22 European countries, 2004–07. Population Studies, 68(3): 265–282. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00324728.2014.899612
HFD (Human Fertility Database). (2024) Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research (Germany) and Vienna Institute of Demography (Austria).
Kocourková, J., & Fait, T. (2009). Can increased use of ART retrieve the Czech Republic from the low fertility trap? Neuro Endocrinol Letter, 30(6):739-748.
Kocourková, J., & Fait, T. (2011). Changes in contraceptive practice and the transition of reproduction pattern in the Czech population. The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care, 16(3): 161-172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/13625187.2011.574750
Kocourková, J., Slabá, J., & Šťastná, A. (2022). The role of cohorts in the understanding of the changes in fertility in Czechia since 1990. Acta Universitatis Carolinae, Geographica, 57(1): 61–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14712/23361980.2022.6
Kocourková, J., Šťastná, A., & Burcin, B. (2023). The influence of the increasing use of assisted reproduction technologies on the recent growth in fertility in Czechia. Scientific Reports, 13(1): 10854. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-37071-7
Kohler, H. P., Knudsen, L. B., Skytthe, A., & Christensen, K. (2002). The fertility pattern of twins and the general population compared: Evidence from Danish cohorts 1945–64. Demographic Research, 6: 383-408. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2002.6.14
Němečková, M. (2016). Vícečetných porodů je již méně (Multiple births are becoming less common). Statistiky & My.
Schmidt, L., Sobotka, T., Bentzen, J. G., Nyboe Andersen, A., & ESHRE Reproduction and Society Task Force. (2012). Demographic and medical consequences of the postponement of parenthood. Human Reproduction Update, 18(1): 29-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmr040
Slabá, J., Kocourková, J. & Šťastná A. (2024). The fertility timing gap: the intended and real timing of childbirth. Journal of Biosocial Science, 56(3): 504–417. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S002193202400004X
Sobotka, T. (2017). Post-transitional fertility: the role of childbearing postponement in fuelling the shift to low and unstable fertility levels. Journal of Biosocial Science, 49(S1): S20-S45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021932017000323
Sobotka, T., Šťastná, A., Zeman, K., Hamplová, D., & Kantorová, V. (2008). Czech Republic: A rapid transformation of fertility and family behaviour after the collapse of state socialism. Demographic Research, 19: 403-454. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2008.19.14
Sobotka, T., Zeman, K., Lesthaeghe, R., Frejka, T., & Neels, K. (2011). Postponement and recuperation in cohort fertility: Austria, Germany and Switzerland in a European context. Comparative Population Studies, 36(2-3): 417-452. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12765/CPoS-2011-10
te Velde, E. T., Habbema, D., Leridon, H., & Eijkemans, M. (2012). The effect of postponement of first motherhood on permanent involuntary childlessness and total fertility rate in six European countries since the 1970s. Human Reproduction, 27(6): 1880-1880. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/des117
Väisänen, H. & Jokela, M. (2010). Fertility after induced abortion: A register-based study in Finland in 2000-2008. Finnish Yearbook of Population Research, 45: 25-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23979/fypr.45052
Van Winkle, Z. (2018). Family trajectories across time and space: Increasing complexity in family life courses in Europe? Demography, 55(1): 135–164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-017-0628-5
