The sibling postcard exercise - substance and methodology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20377/jfr-1345Keywords:
written accounts, gender and age cohort, surface thematic analysis, family structure, geographical location, work, postcard research method, leaving homeAbstract
Objective: This research note has both substantive and methodological objectives. It presents an account of undertaking a surface thematic analysis of a data sub-set from a repurposed public engagement written postcard exercise, to consider: (i) the significant non-relationally framed (i.e. factual and not related to the quality of the sibling relationship) information that people across gender and generation think that researchers should know about their siblings, and (ii) the written postcard exercise as a potential research method in family research.
Background: Much research on siblings is concerned with outcomes or everyday relational processes. There is less attention to what people themselves regard as significant features of their siblings’ circumstances that is not shaped by researcher agendas and interactions.
Method: The research note draws on electronic and hard copy written postcard data, submitted in response to the open prompt "Please tell us about your brothers and sisters", submitted by 795 children and adults. The majority were aged 29-58 and were female. A surface thematic analysis was undertaken to identify the factual, non-relationally framed information provided by postcard writers in a data sub-set in order to identify the issues that they regarded as important.
Results: Postcard writers providing factual information about their siblings’ circumstances did so largely in the here-and-now of their siblings' lives. They addressed family form, geographical location, and age at which siblings left home, framing this non-relationally as information about their siblings.
Conclusion: The analysis of sibling-provided information that is not relationally framed provides an alternative or additional perspective to both developmental outcomes research and studies of sibling perspectives. The postcard exercise offers possibilities as a data generation method that enables an initial co-production design.
References
Azmitia, M. & Hesser, J. (1993). Why siblings are important agents of cognitive development: a comparison of siblings and peers. Child Development 64(2), 430-444. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1131260
Brannen, J. & O’Brien, M. (1995). Childhood and the sociological gaze: paradigms and paradoxes. Sociology 29(4), 729-737. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038595029004011
Brannen, J., Bhopal, K. & Heptinstall, E. (2000). Connecting children: Care and family life in later childhood. Routledge/Falmer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203996355
British Academy (2019). Reframing childhood past and present: Chronologies.
Butera, K.J. (2016). Manhunt: the challenge of enticing men to participate in a study on friendship. Qualitative Enquiry 12(6), 1262-1282. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800406288634
Bytheway, B., Weller, S., Bornat, J. & Edwards, R. (2008). Sisters and brothers: Results of a UK-wide postcard exercise: ESRC Festival of Social Science 2008.
Davies, K. (2023). Siblings and sociology. Manchester University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7765/9781526142184
Edwards, R., Hadfield, L., Lucey, H. & Mauthner, M. (2006). Sibling identity and relationships: Sisters and brothers. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203448809
Gillis, J. (1997). A world of their own making. Harvard University Press.
Goddard, C. (2011). Semantic analysis: A practical introduction. Oxford University Press.
Gulløv, E. & Winther, I.W. (2021). Sibling relationships: being connected and related. In A-M. Castrén et al. (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of family sociology in Europe (pp. 301-321). Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73306-3_15
Gutierrez Muñoz, C. & Brannen, J. (2021). The concept of generations. Oxford Bibliographies.
Hamwey, M.K., Rolan, E.P., Jensen, A.C., Whiteman, S.D. & Jackson, H.M. (2019). “Absence makes the heart grow fonder”: A qualitative examination of sibling relationships during emerging adulthood. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36(8), 2487–2506. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407518789514
HESA (2010). Staff at Higher Education institutions in the United Kingdom 2008/09.
Kristensen, G.K. & Ravn, M.N. (2015). The voices heard and the voices silenced: recruitment processes in qualitative interview studies. Qualitative Research, 15(6), 722-737. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794114567496
McHale, S.M., Updegraff, K.A. & Whiteman, S.D. (2012). Sibling relationships and influences in childhood and adolescence. Journal of Marriage and Family, 74(5), 913-930. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2012.01011.x
Mostafa, T., Gambara, L., & Joshi, H. (2018). The impact of complex family structure on child well-being: evidence from siblings. Journal of Marriage and Family, 80(4), 902-918. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12456
Office for National Statistics (ONS) (2019). Birth characteristics in England and Wales: 2017.
Owen, D. (undated). Profile of Black and Minority ethnic groups in the UK.
Punch, S. (2018). Negotiating sibling relationships and birth order hierarchies. In S. Punch, R. Vanderback & T. Skelton (Eds.), Families, Intergenerationally and Peer Group Relations: Geographies of Children and Young People (pp. 107-128). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-026-1_7
Savell, S.M., Saini, R., Ramos, M., Wilson, M.N., Lemery-Chalfant, K. & Shaw, D.S. (2022). Family processes and structure: longitudinal influences on adolescent disruptive and internalising behaviours. Family Relations: Interdisciplinary Journal of Applied Family Science, 2(1), 361-382. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/fare.12728
Sopcak, N., Mayan, M. & Skrypnek, B.J. (2015). Engaging young fathers in research through photo-interviewing. The Qualitative Report, 20(11), 1871-1880. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2015.2396
Stuifbergen, M.C., van Delden, J.J.M. & Dykstra, P.A. (2008). The implications of today’s family structures for support giving to older parents. Ageing and Society, 28(3), 413-434. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X07006666
Sẏkorová, D. (2024). Siblinghood amongst older adults: what being a sibling or having siblings means. Journal of Family Issues 45(2), 419-446. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X221150974
van den Broek, T. & Dykstra, P.A. (2017). The impact of siblings on the geographic distance between adult children and their ageing parents. Does parental need matter? Population, Space and Place, 23 (6), e2048. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.2048
