Care involvement and power relations. Parenting and gender in contemporary Poland




parental leave, gender roles, power relations, Poland, care work


Objective: The study examines the opportunity structures of fathers and mothers in Polish society in the context of their right to use parental leave.

Background: The use of parental leave by fathers remains at a low level in Poland. The reasons for this lie in the way the family policy system is designed and also in cultural norms regarding care and gender. Consequently, Polish fathers and mothers have different possibilities for actually taking parental leave.

Method: The analysis is based on qualitative data gathered during in-depth interviews with Polish mothers and fathers. In total, 53 interviews were conducted with parents of children aged 1-8 from different socio-economic situations and with different attitudes to parenthood and gender roles.

Results: The analysis shows that the opportunity structures of fathers and mothers differ distinctly. Fathers and mothers use different types of power in their relationship. Fathers usually use debilitative power that allows them to withdraw from unwanted obligations to care, and also not to take parental leave. In contrast, mothers use situational power, which helps them sustain control over family life. Both of these strategies for using power limit the other person’s right to use or not to use parental leave.

Conclusion: The findings suggest that there is a need to change the system of parental leave in Poland if gender equality is to be achieved.


Allen, S. M., & Hawkins, A. J. (1999). Maternal gatekeeping: Mothers’ beliefs and behaviors that inhibit greater father involvement in family work. Journal of Marriage and Family, 61(1), 199–212. DOI:

Altenburger, L. E., Schoppe-Sullivan, S. J., & Kamp Dush, C. M. (2018). Associations between maternal gatekeeping and fathers’ parenting quality. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 27(8), 2678–2689. DOI:

Archer, M. S. (2000). Being human: The problem of agency. Cambridge University Press. DOI:

Ayres, L. (2008). Thematic coding and analysis. In L. M. Given (Ed.), The SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods. Sage Publications, 867–868.

Benaquisto, L. (2008). Open coding. In L. M. Given (Ed.), The SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods. Sage Publications, 581–582.

Brandth, B., & Kvande, E. (2019). Flexibility: Some consequences for fathers’ caregiving. In P. Moss, A.-Z. Duvander, & A. Koslowski (Eds.), Parental leave and beyond: Recent international developments, current issues and future directions. Policy Press, 205–221. DOI:

Bygren, M., & Duvander, A.-Z. (2006). Parents’ workplace situation and fathers’ parental leave use. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68(2), 363–372. DOI:

Caetano, A. (2015). Defining personal reflexivity: A critical reading of Archer’s approach. European Journal of Social Theory, 18(1), 60–75. DOI:

Dowd, N. E. (2000). Redefining fatherhood. New York University Press.

Duffy, S., Van Esch, P., & Yousef, M. (2020). Increasing parental leave uptake: A systems social marketing approach. Australasian Marketing Journal, 28(2), 110–118. DOI:

Duvander, A.-Z., & Johansson, M. (2012). What are the effects of reforms promoting fathers’ parental leave use? Journal of European Social Policy, 22(3), 319–330. DOI:

Ellingsæter, A. L., & Gulbrandsen, L. (2007). Closing the childcare gap: The interaction of childcare provision and mothers’ agency in Norway. Journal of Social Policy, 36(4), 649–669. DOI:

Gatrell, C. (2007). Whose child is it anyway? The negotiation of paternal entitlements within marriage. The Sociological Review, 55(2), 352–372. DOI:

Gaunt, R. (2007). Maternal gatekeeping: Antecedents and consequences. Journal of Family Issues, 29(3), 373–395. DOI:

Grau, M., las Heras Maestro, M., & Riley Bowles, H. (Eds.). (2022). Engaged fatherhood for men, families and gender equality: healthcare, social policy, and work perspectives. Springer International Publishing. DOI:

Haas, L. (1992). Equal parenthood and social policy: A study of parental leave in Sweden. SUNY Press.

Haas, L., & Hwang, C. P. (2019). Policy is not enough—the influence of the gendered workplace on fathers’ use of parental leave in Sweden. Community, Work & Family, 22(1), 58–76. DOI:

Haas, L., & Rostgaard, T. (2011). Fathers’ rights to paid parental leave in the Nordic countries: Consequences for the gendered division of leave. Community, Work & Family, 14(2), 177–195. DOI:

Hobson, B. (Ed.). (2002). Making men into fathers men, masculinities, and the social politics of fatherhood. Cambridge University Press. DOI:

Jarska, N. (2019). Female breadwinners in state socialism: The value of women’s work for wages in post-Stalinist Poland. Contemporary European History, 28(4), 469–483. DOI:

Karu, M., & Tremblay, D.-G. (2018). Fathers on parental leave: An analysis of rights and take-up in 29 countries. Community, Work & Family, 21(3), 344–362. DOI:

Kaufman, G. (2018). Barriers to equality: Why British fathers do not use parental leave. Community, Work and Family, 21(3), 310-325. DOI:

Kaufman, G., & Almqvist, A.-L. (2017). The role of partners and workplaces in British and Swedish men’s parental leave decisions. Men and Masculinities, 20(5), 533–551. DOI:

Klinth, R. (2008). The best of both worlds? Fatherhood and gender equality in Swedish paternity leave campaigns, 1976–2006. Fathering: A Journal of Theory, Research, and Practice about Men as Fathers, 6(1), 20–38. DOI:

Korsvik, T. R., & Warat, M. (2016). Framing leave for fathers in Norway and Poland: Just a matter of gender equality? NORA—Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 24(2), 110–125. DOI:

Kozek, W., Kubisa, J., & Zieleńska, M. (2017). Utrzymać się na powierzchni: O walce z biedą w pięciu krajach europejskich w perspektywie indywidualnego sprawstwa. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.

Lewington, L., Lee, J., & Sebar, B. (2021). “I’m not just a babysitter”: Masculinity and men’s experiences of first-time fatherhood. Men and Masculinities, 24(4), 571–589. DOI:

Moss, P., Duvander, A.-Z., & Koslowski, A. (Eds.). (2019). Parental leave and beyond: recent international developments, current issues and future directions (1st ed.). Policy Press. DOI:

O’Brien, M., & Wall, K. (Eds.). (2017). Comparative perspectives on work-life balance and gender equality: Fathers on leave alone. Springer International Publishing. DOI:

Paull, G. (2008). Children and women’s hours of work. The Economic Journal, 118(526), F8–F27. DOI:

Pfau-Effinger, B., & Rostgaard, T. (2011). Introduction: Tensions related to care in European welfare states. In B. Pfau-Effinger & T. Rostgaard (Eds.), Care between work and welfare in European societies. Palgrave Macmillan, 1–14. DOI:

Reimann, M. (2016). Searching for egalitarian divisions of care: Polish couples at the life-course transition to parenthood. In D. Grunow & M. Evertsson (Eds.), Couples’ transitions to parenthood: Analysing gender and work in Europe. Edward Elgar Publishing, 221–242. DOI:

Reimann, M. (2019). It is not something we consciously do: Polish couples’ struggles to maintain gender equality after the birth of their first child. In D. Grunow & M. Evertsson (Eds.), New parents in Europe. Work-care practices, gender norms and family policies. Edward Elgar Publishing, 188–206. DOI:

Rudman, L. A., & Mescher, K. (2013). Penalizing men who request a family leave: Is flexibility stigma a femininity stigma? Journal of Social Issues, 69(2), 322–340. DOI:

Saxonberg, S. (2013). From defamilialization to degenderization: Toward a new welfare typology. Social Policy & Administration, 47(1), 26–49. DOI:

Saxonberg, S. (2014). Gendering family policies in post-Communist Europe: A historical-institutional analysis. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI:

Schober, P. S. (2013). The parenthood effect on gender inequality: Explaining the change in paid and domestic work when British couples become parents. European Sociological Review, 29(1), 74–85. DOI:

Sikorska, M. (2016). From “absent father” to “involved father”: Changes in the model of fatherhood in Poland and role of mothers-“gatekeepers”. In E. Ruspini & I. Crespi (Eds.), Balancing work and family in a changing society: The fathers’ perspective. Palgrave Macmillan, 163–175. DOI:

Sikorska, M. (2019). Praktyki rodzinne i rodzicielskie we współczesnej Polsce—Rekonstrukcja codzienności. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.

Smart, C., & Neale, B. (1998). Family fragments? Polity Press.

Solera, C., & Mencarini, L. (2018). The gender division of housework after the first child: A comparison among Bulgaria, France and the Netherlands. Community, Work & Family, 21(5), 519–540. DOI:

Sponton, A. (2021). Exploring COVID-19 lockdowns as unexpected paternity leave: One shock, diverse gender ideologies. Journal of Family Research, 34(1), 41-66. DOI:

Suwada, K. (2015). The naturalisation of a difference. The experience of fatherhood in Sweden and Poland. Studia Humanistyczne AGH 16(2), 141–154. DOI:

Suwada, K. (2017). Men, fathering and the gender trap. Sweden and Poland compared. Basingstoke. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI:

Suwada, K. (2021). Parenting and work in Poland: A gender studies perspective. Cham: Springer International Publishing. DOI:

Szelewa, D. (2017). From implicit to explicit familialism: Post-1989 family policy reforms in Poland. In D. Auth, J. Hergenhan & B. Holland-Cunz (Eds.) Gender and family in European economic policy. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 129–51. DOI:

Van Gasse, D., Wood, J., & Verdonck, C. (2021). Parenthood ideologies and leave practices among Belgian fathers: A typology of parental leave perspectives for Belgian men. Community, Work & Family, 1–19. DOI:

West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender & Society, 1(2), 125–151. DOI:

West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (2009). Accounting for doing gender: Gender & Society, 112–122. DOI:




How to Cite

Suwada, K. (2022). Care involvement and power relations. Parenting and gender in contemporary Poland. Journal of Family Research, 34(3), 892–911.