Labour markets, families and public policies shaping gender relations and parenting: Introduction to the Special Issue
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20377/jfr-842Keywords:
Family policy, Fathering, Gender, Mothering, Migrant fathers, Parental leave, PovertyAbstract
Objective: This article introduces the reader to the Special Issue "Labour markets, families and public policies shaping gender relations and parenting" and gives a theoretical and empirical overview of gender roles and gender equality in Europe.
Background: This Special Issue analyses the connection between labour markets, families, social policy, and gender relations in several European countries.
Method: The six included articles are based on qualitative and quantitative approaches and data that have been gathered in Finland, Norway, Poland, Spain, and across the entire EU.
Results: Key findings are: (1) In less egalitarian countries, children of single parents suffer more nutritional, educational and social life deprivation. (2) The institutional design of parental leave can contribute to reproducing gender inequality in the use of leave. (3) The institutional design interacts with cultural norms in shaping fatherhood practices of migrant fathers. (4) Individualised, performance-based wage and career schemes can counteract the effects of gender-equalising family policies. (5) Fathers taking leave independently from the mother and for an extended period are more involved in childcare beyond the leave period, and (6) the use of longer unpaid parental leave by mothers leads to a more unequal distribution of childcare between the parents.
Conclusion: This Special Issue highlights that even in the most egalitarian countries, there remain persistent challenges to achieving gender equality regarding labour market, institutions and family life.
References
Altintas, E. & Sullivan, O. (2016). Fifty years of change updated: Cross-national gender convergence in housework. Demographic Research, 34(16):455–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2016.35.16
Bernhardt, E. (2004). Is the second demographic transition a useful concept for demography? Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, Vienna Institute of Demography (VID) of the Austrian Academy of Sciences in Vienna, 2(1): 25-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1553/populationyearbook2004s25
Böger, T. & Öktem, K. G. (2019). Levels or worlds of welfare? Assessing social rights and social stratification in Northern and Southern countries, Social Policy and Administration, 53: 63–77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12455
Blum, S., Kuhlmann, J., & Schubert, K. (2019). Handbook of European Welfare Systems, Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429290510
Bungum, B. & Kvande, E. (2022). Polish migrant fathers using parental leave in Norway. Journal of Family Research. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20377/jfr-753
Cahn, N., Carbone, J., Fields, L. & Bradford, W. (2018). Unequal families Lives, Cambridge University Press.
Canaan, S., Lassen, A., Rosenbaum, P. & Steingrimsdottir, S. (2022). Maternity Leave and Paternity Leave: Evidence on the Economic Impact of Legislative Changes in High Income Countries, Discussion Paper Series, IZA DP No. 15129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190625979.013.806
Castro-García, C., & Pazos-Moran, M. (2016). Parental leave policy and gender equality in Europe, Feminist Economics, 22(3): 51-73, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2015.1082033
Castrén, A.M., Česnuitytė, V., Crespi, I., Gauthier. J., Gouveia, R., Martin, C., Moreno Mínguez, A. & Suwada, K. (2021). The Palgrave Handbook of Family Sociology in Europe. Palgrave. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73306-3
Cooke, P. & Baxter, J. (2010). Families in international context: Comparing institutional effects across Western societies. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(3): 516–536. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00716.x
Day, R. D. & Lamb, M. E. (2004). Conceptualizing and measuring father involvement: Pathways, problems and progress. In R. D. Day & M. E. Lamb (Eds.), Conceptualizing and Measuring Father Involvement (pp. 1–15). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410609380
Eerola, P., Närvi, J. & Lammi-Taskula, J. (2022). Can fathers’ leave take-up dismantle gendered parental responsibilities? Evidence from Finland. Journal of Family Research. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20377/jfr-723
Esping Andersen, G. (2009). Incomplete Revolution: Adapting Welfare States to Women’s New Roles. Policy Press.
European Institute for Gender Equality (2021). Gender Equality Index, 2021 Edition. Available at: https://eige.europa.eu/gender-equality-index/2021/compare-countries/work/map
Ferragina, E. (2019). The political economy of family policy expansion: Fostering neoliberal capitalism or promoting gender equality supporting social reproduction? Review of International Political Economy, 26(6): 1238-1265. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2019.1627568
Goldscheider, F., Bernhardt, E. & Lappegard, T. (2015). The gender revolution: A framework for understanding changing family and demographic behaviour. Population and Development Review, 41(2): 207–239. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2015.00045.x
Greve, B. (2022). Rethinking Welfare and the Welfare State. Edward Elgar. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800885127
Jenson, J., Laufer, J. & Maruani, M. (2017). The Gendering of Inequalities: Women, Men and Work. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315202815
Halrynjo, S., & Mangset, M. (2022). Parental leave vs. competition for clients: Motherhood penalty in competitive work environments. Journal of Family Research. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20377/jfr-751
Karu, M. & Tremblay, D.-G. (2018). Fathers on parental leave: an analysis of rights and take-up in 29 countries. Community, Work & Family, 21(3): 344-362. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2017.1346586
Koslowski, A., Blum, S., Dobrotić, I., Kaufman, G. & Moss, P. (2021). 17th International Review of Leave Policies and Related Research 2021. Available at: www.leavenetwork.org/annual-review-reports/review-2021/
Lanau, A. & Lozano, M. (2022). Job precariousness and poverty dynamics among households with children. Perspectives Demogràfiques. 27: 1-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46710/ced.pd.eng.27
Lesthaeghe, R. (2010). The unfolding story of the second demographic transition. Population and Development Review, 36(2): 211–251. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2010.00328.x
Lesthaeghe, T. (2020). The second demographic transition, 1986–2020: sub-replacement fertility and rising cohabitation—a global update. Genus, 10(1): 76-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41118-020-00077-4
Lewis, J. (2009). Work-family Balance, Gender and Policy. Edward Elgar. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781848447400
Matysiak, A. & Cukrowska-Torzewska, E. (2021). Gender and labour market outcomes. In N. F. Schneider & M. Kreyenfeld (Eds.). Research Handbook on the Sociology of the Family (pp. 329-341). Edward Elgar Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788975544.00032
McLanahan, S. (2009). Fragile families and the reproduction of poverty. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 621(1): 111-131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716208324862
Meil, G., Romero-Balsas, P. & Rogero-García, J. (2018). Parental leave in Spain: Use, motivations and implications. Revista Española de Sociología, 27(3), 27–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22325/fes/res.2018.32
Morero-Mínguez, A. & Ortega-Gaspar, M. (2022). A Change in Work-Family/Life or a Return to Traditional Normative Patterns in Spain? Systematic Review. Front. Sociol. 7:807591. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2022.807591
Moreno Mínguez, A., & Pérez-Corral, A. L. (2022). Job insecurity and child well-being in single-parent families in Europe: A matter of family and gender policy. Journal of Family Research. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20377/jfr-765
Moss, P., Duvander, A. & Koslowski, A. (2019). Parental Leave and Beyond: Recent International Developments, Current Issues and Future Directions. Policy Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781447338772.001.0001
Pailhé, A., Solaz, A. & Stanfors, M. (2021). The great convergence: Gender and unpaid work in Europe and the United States. Population and Development Review, 47(1): 181–217. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/padr.12385
Peters, P. & Blomme, R. (2019). Forget about ‘the ideal worker’: A theoretical contribution to the debate on flexible workplace designs, work/life conflict, and opportunities for gender equality. Business Horizons, 62(5): 603-613. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2019.04.003
Ray, R., Gornick, J. C. & Schmitt, J. (2010). Who cares? Assessing generosity and gender equality in parental leave policy designs in 21 Countries. Journal of European Social Policy, 19(5): 196–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928710364434
Remery, C. & Schippers, J. (2019). Work-Family Conflict in the European Union: The Impact of Organizational and Public Facilities. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(22):4419. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16224419
Romero-Balsas, P., Meil, G., & Rogero-García, J. (2022). Is Spanish parental leave ’traditionalising’ the gender distribution of childcare and housework? Journal of Family Research. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20377/jfr-745
Saxonberg, S. (2013). From defamilialization to degenderization: Toward a new welfare typology, Social Policy & Administration, 47(1): 26-49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9515.2012.00836.x
Schneider, N. & Kreyenfeld, M. (2021). Research Handbook on the Sociology of the Family. Edward Elgar. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788975544
Schneider, N. (2012). The future of the family in Europe. Diversity and convergence, In: H. Bertram & N. Ehlert (Eds.). Family, Ties, and Care. Family Transformation in a Plural Modernity (pp. 225–239). Barbara Budrich.
Suwada, K. (2022). Care involvement and power relations. Parenting and gender in contemporary Poland. Journal of Family Research. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20377/jfr-722
Zagel H. & Lohmann, H. (2020). Conceptual approaches in comparative family policy research. In R. Nieuwenhuis & W. Van Lancker (Eds.). The Palgrave Handbook of Family Policy (pp. 119-139). Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54618-2_6
