Gender and policies on paid family care: Overview of debate and theoretical reflections
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20377/jfr-938Keywords:
theoretical debate, care policy, family care, genderAbstract
Objective: This article discusses the implications of systematically including policies on paid family care in the concept of care policy for older people for theorizing the relationship between such policies and gender inequality.
Background: In theoretical debates about the relationship between gender and care policy, most welfare state researchers agree that policies that support extra-familial care promote women’s participation in formal, paid work and can thus reduce gender inequality. By contrast, the role of policies that offer pay and elements of social security for family care in promoting gender equality is up for debate.
Method: This article addresses the aforementioned debates’ key arguments by discussing the relationship between gender equality and care policies that actively support family caregivers. The argument is contextualized with examples of empirical findings from the literature.
Results: We argue that, to some degree and under specific conditions, new policies on paid family care have the potential to reduce gender inequality.
Conclusion: The article contributes to theoretical debates about gender and care policy by evaluating the implications of systematically including policies on paid family care in the study of care policy. This inclusion could clarify the circumstances under which policy support for family caregivers can contribute to fostering gender equality.
References
Akgunduz, Y. E., & Plantenga, J. (2013). Labour market effects of parental leave in Europe. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 37(4), 845–862. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bes052
Anttonen, A., & Zechner, M. (2011). Theorizing care and care work: In B. Pfau-Effinger & T. Rostgaard (Eds.), Care between work and welfare (pp. 15–34). Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230307612_2
Aulenbacher, B., Lutz, H., & Schwitter, K. (2021). Gute Sorge ohne gute Arbeit? Beltz Juventa.
Bettio, F., & Plattenga, J. (2004). Comparing care regimes in Europe. Feminist Economics, 10(1), 85–113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1354570042000198245
Bettio, F., & Verashchagina, A. (2012). Long-term care for the elderly: Provision and providers in 33 European countries. Publications Office of the European Union.
Bouget, D., Spasova, S., & Vanhercke, B. (2016). Work-life balance measures for persons of working age with dependent relatives in Europe. European Social Policy Network.
Brimblecombe, N., Fernández, J.‑L., Knapp, M., Rehill, A., & Wittenberg, R. (2018). Review of the international evidence on support for unpaid carers. Journal of Long-Term Care, 25–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31389/jltc.3
Ciccia, R., & Bleijenbergh, I. (2014). After the male breadwinner model? Childcare services and the division of labor in European countries. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 21(1), 50–79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxu002
Ciccia, R., & Sainsbury, D. (2018). Gendering welfare state analysis: Tensions between care and paid work. European Journal of Politics and Gender, 1(1), 93–109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1332/251510818X15272520831102
Courtin, E., Jemiai, N., & Mossialos, E. (2014). Mapping support policies for informal carers across the European Union. Health Policy, 118(1), 84–94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2014.07.013
Crompton, R. (Ed.). (1999). Restructuring gender relations and employment: The decline of the male breadwinner. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198294696.001.0001
Dalla Costa, M., & James, S. (1972). The power of women and the subversion of the community. Falling Wall Press.
Daly, M. (2011). What adult worker model? A critical look at recent social policy reform in Europe from a gender and family perspective. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 18(1), 1–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxr002
Daly, M. (2020). Gender inequality and welfare states in Europe. Edward Elgar. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788111263
Daly, M., & Lewis, J. (2000). The concept of social care and the analysis of contemporary welfare states. British Journal of Sociology, 51(2), 281–298. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4446.2000.00281.x
Da Roit, B., & Le Bihan, B. (2010). Similar and yet so different: Cash-for-care schemes in six European countries’ long-term care policies. The Milbank Quarterly, 88(3), 286–309. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0009.2010.00601.x
Da Roit, B., & Le Bihan, B. (2019). Cash for long‐term care: Policy debates, visions, and designs on the move. Social Policy & Administration, 53(4), 519–536. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12506
Deusdad, B. A., Comas-d’Argemir, D., & Dziegielewski, S. F. (2016). Restructuring long-term care in Spain. Journal of Social Service Research, 42(2), 246–262. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01488376.2015.1129013
Dobrotić, I., Blom, S., & Koslowski, A. (Eds.) (2023). Research handbook on leave policy: Parenting and social inequalities in a global perspective. Edward Elgar. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800372214
Eggers, T., & Grages, C. (2023). Social risks of family carers in the context of welfare state policies. Journal of Family Research, 35, 304–325. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20377/jfr-890
Eggers, T., Grages, C., Pfau-Effinger, B., & Och, R. (2020). Re-conceptualising the relationship between de-familialisation and familialisation and the implications for gender equality – the case of long-term care policies for older people. Ageing and Society, 40(4), 869–895. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X18001435
Eggers, T., Grages, C., & Pfau-Effinger, B. (2021). Politiken zur familialen Care-Arbeit und Gleichstellung der Geschlechter–eine theoretische Diskussion. In S. Scherger, R. Abramowski, I. Dingeldey, A. Hokema & A. Schäfer (Eds.) Geschlechter-ungleichheiten in Arbeit, Familie und Wohlfahrtsstaat (pp. 165-190). Campus.
Eggers, T., Grages, C., & Pfau-Effinger, B. (2022). Care-Politiken, soziale Risiken und Geschlechterungleichheit im internationalen Vergleich. In U. Knobloch, H. Theobald, C. Dengler, A.-C. Kleinert, C. Gnadt, & H. Lehner (Eds.), Caring Societies – Sorgende Gesellschaften: Neue Abhängigkeiten oder mehr Gerechtigkeit? (pp. 38–65). Beltz Juventa.
Ehrlich, U., Minkus, L., & Hess, M. (2020). Einkommensrisiko Pflege? Der Zusammenhang von familiärer Pflege und Lohn. Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie, 53(1), 22–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00391-019-01666-5
Eichler, M., & Pfau-Effinger, B. (2009). The ‘consumer principle’ in the care of elderly people: Free choice and actual choice in the German welfare state. Social Policy & Administration, 43(6), 617–633. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9515.2009.00684.x
EIGE (2023). Gender equality index 2023. Publications Office of the European Union.
England, P. (2005). Emerging theories of care work. Annual Review of Sociology, 31(1), 381–399. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.31.041304.122317
Esping-Andersen, G. (1999). Social foundations of postindustrial economies. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/0198742002.001.0001
Eydal, G. B., & Rostgaard, T. (Eds.) (2014). Fatherhood in the Nordic welfare states. Comparing care policies and practice. Policy Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781447310471.001.0001
Federici, S. (1975). Wages against housework. Falling Wall Print.
Fink, M., & Valovka, K. (2018). ESPN thematic report on challenges in long-term care. Austria. European Commission.
Folbre, N., & Nelson, J. (2000). For love or money? The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(4), 123–140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.14.4.123
Fraser, N. (1994). After the family wage: Gender equity and the welfare state. Political Theory, 22(4), 591–618. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591794022004003
Frericks, P., Jensen, P. H., & Pfau-Effinger, B. (2014). Social rights and employment rights related to family care: Family care regimes in Europe. Journal of Aging Studies, 29, 66–77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2013.12.002
Geissler, B., & Pfau-Effinger, B. (2005). Change in European care arrangements. In B. Pfau-Effinger & B. Geissler (Eds.), Care and social integration in European Societies (pp. 3–19). Policy Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46692/9781847421340.002
Gerlinger, T. (2018). ESPN thematic report on challenges in long-term care. Germany. European Commission.
Gornick, J. C., & Meyers, M. K. (2008). Creating gender egalitarian societies: An agenda for reform. Politics & Society, 36(3), 313–349. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329208320562
Hess, M., de Tavernier, W., & Naegele, L. (2020). Culture matters: Normen, Erwerbstätigkeit und informelle Pflege von älteren Frauen in Europa. [Culture matters: Norms, employment and informal care by older women in Europe]. Sozialer Fortschritt, 69(10), 667–685. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3790/sfo.69.10.667
Hess, M., Schmitz, W., Naegele, L., & Stiemke, P. (2023). You will take care of me when I am old: Norms on children’s caregiver obligations. Journal of Family Research, 35, 196–211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20377/jfr-854
Himmelweit, S. (2007). The Prospects for caring: Economic theory and policy analysis, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 31(4), 581–599. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bem011
International Labor Organization. (2018). Care work and care jobs: For the future of decent work. https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---dcomm/---publ/documents/publication/wcms_633135.pdf [retrieved: October 11, 2023]
Jensen, P. H., Møberg, R. J., Och, R., & Pfau-Effinger, B. (2017). Explaining differences in women’s working time in European cities. European Societies, 19(2), 138–156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2016.1268700
Jenson, J. (2015). The fading goal of gender equality: Three policy directions that underpin the resilience of gendered socio-economic inequalities. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 22(4), 539–560. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxv035
Jessoula, M., Pavolini, E., Raitano, M., & Natili, M. (2018). ESPN thematic report on challenges in long-term care. Italy. European Commission.
Kadi, S., Rodrigues, R., Kahlert, R., Hofmann, S., & Bauer, G. (2022). Does the family care best? Journal of Social Policy, 1–18.
Knijn, T., & Kremer, M. (1997). Gender and the caring dimension of welfare states: Toward inclusive citizenship. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 4(3), 328–362. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.sp.a034270
Kodate, N., & Timonen, V. (2017). Bringing the family in through the back door. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 32(3), 291–301. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10823-017-9325-5
Kröger, T. (2011). Defamilisation, dedomestication and care policy. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 31(7/8), 424–440. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/01443331111149860
Kvist, J. (2018). ESPN thematic report on challenges in long-term care. Denmark. European Commission.
Land, H. (1978). Who cares for the family? Journal of Social Policy, 7(3), 257–284. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279400007893
Le Bihan, B., Lamura, G., Marcak, J., Fernandez, J.‑L., Johansson, L., & Sowa-Kofta, A. (2019). Policy measures adopted to support unpaid care across Europe. Eurohealth, 25(4), 10–15.
Leitner, S. (2003). Varieties of familialism: The caring function of the family in comparative perspective. European Societies, 5(4), 353–375. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1461669032000127642
Leitner, S., & Lessenich, S. (2007). (In-)dependence as dependent variable: Conceptualising and measuring ‘de-familisation’. In J. Clasen & N.A. Siegel (Eds.), Investigating welfare state change (pp. 244–60). Edward Elgar. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781847206916.00022
León, M., Ranci, C., & Rostgaard, T. (2014). Pressures towards and within universalism. In M. León (Ed.), The Transformation of Care in European Societies (pp. 11–34). Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137326515_2
Lewis, J. (1992). Gender and the development of welfare regimes. Journal of European Social Policy, 2(3), 159–173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/095892879200200301
Lewis, J., & Giullari, S. (2005). The adult worker model family, gender equality and care. Economy and Society, 34(1), 76–104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0308514042000329342
Lister, R. (1994). ‘She has other duties’: Women, citizenship and social security. In S. Baldwin & J. Falkingham (Eds.), Social security and social change. New challenges to the Beveridge model (pp. 31–44). Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Liversage, A. (2023). A challenging responsibility: Care for older parents in Turkish immigrant families. Journal of Family Research, 35, 286–303. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20377/jfr-858
Lohmann, H., & Zagel, H. (2016). Family policy in comparative perspective: The concepts and measurement of familization and defamilization. Journal of European Social Policy, 26(1), 48–65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928715621712
McLaughlin, E., & Glendinning, C. (1994). Paying for care in Europe: Is there a feminist approach? In L. Hantrais & S. Mangen (Eds.), Family policy and the welfare of women, concepts and contexts in international comparisons (pp. 52–69). European Research Centre.
Naldini, M., Pavolini, E., & Solera, C. (2016). Female employment and elderly care: The role of care policies and culture in 21 European countries. Work, Employment and Society, 30(4), 607–630. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017015625602
OECD (2023). Health at a Glance 2023. OECD Publishing.
Orloff, A. S. (1993). Gender and the social right of citizenship: The comparative analysis of gender relations and welfare states. American Sociological Review, 58(3), 303–328. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2095903
Orloff, A. S. (2009). Should feminists aim for gender symmetry? Why a dual-earner/dual-caregiver society is not every feminist’s utopia. In J. C. Gornick & M. K. Meyers (Eds.), Gender equality (pp. 129–157). Verso.
Ostner, I. (1978). Beruf und Hausarbeit. Die Arbeit der Frau in unserer Gesellschaft. Campus-Verlag.
Pfau-Effinger, B. (2005). Culture and Welfare State Policies: Reflections on a Complex Interrelation. Journal of Social Policy, 34(1), 3-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279404008232
Ranci, C., & Pavolini, E. (2015). Not all that glitters is gold: Long-term care reforms in the last two decades in Europe. Journal of European Social Policy, 25(3), 270–285. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928715588704
Ranci, C., & Arlotti, M. (2019). Resistance to change: The problem of high non-take up in implementing policy innovations in the Italian long-term care system. Policy and Society, 10(3), 1–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2019.1619995
Reimer, T. (2019). Why fathers don’t take more parental leave in Germany. Community, Work & Family, 36(3), 1–20.
Rummery, K. (2009). A comparative discussion of the gendered implications of cash-for-care schemes. Social Policy & Administration, 43(6), 634–648. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9515.2009.00685.x
Rummery, K. (2021). Gender equality and the governance of long-term care policy. Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy, 37(1), 16–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/ics.2020.16
Saraceno, C. (2023). The Role of the “Social Investment” Concept for the Development of Family Policy. In M. Daly, B. Pfau-Effinger, N. Gilbert & D. J. Besharov (Eds), The Oxford Handbook of Family Policy Over the Life Course (pp. 308–323). Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197518151.013.15
Saraceno, C. (1997). Family Change, Family Policies and the Restructuring of Welfare. In Office of Economic and Cooperative Development (Eds), Family, Market and Community: Equity and Efficiency in Social Policy (pp. 81–100). OECD Publishing.
Saraceno, C., & Keck, W. (2011). Towards an integrated approach for the analysis of gender equity in policies supporting paid work and care responsibilities. Demographic Research, 25(11), 371–406. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2011.25.11
Saxonberg, S. (2013). From defamilialization to degenderization. Social Policy & Administration, 47(1), 26–49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9515.2012.00836.x
Schäfer, A., & Gottschall, K. (2015). From wage regulation to wage gap. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 39(2), 467–496. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bev005
Shaver, S. (Ed.). (2018). Handbook on gender and social policy. Edward Elgar. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781785367168.00005
Spasova, S., Baeten, R., Coster, S., Ghailani, D., Pena-Casas, R., & Vanhercke, B. (2018). Challenges in long-term care in Europe. European Commission.
Theobald, H., & Luppi, M. (2018). Elderly care in changing societies: Concurrences in divergent care regimes. Current Sociology, 66(4), 629–642. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392118765232
Tronto, J.C. (1993). Moral boundaries: A political argument for an ethic of care. Routledge.
Ungerson, C. (2004). Whose empowerment and independence? A cross-national perspective on cash for care schemes. Ageing and Society, 24(2), 189–212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X03001508
Verloo, M., & Lombardo, E. (2007). Contested gender equality and policy variety in Europe. In M. Verloo (Ed.), Multiple meanings of gender equality: A critical frame analysis of gender policies in Europe (pp. 21–51). CEU Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9786155211393-006
Wærness, K. (2000). Fürsorgerationalität. Feministische Studien, extra, 18(1), 54–57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/fs-2000-s106
Yamane, S. (2021). Gender equality, paid and unpaid care and domestic work. The Japanese Political Economy, 47(1), 44–63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2329194X.2021.1874826
